When we do not know much detail about a particular client’s needs in doing a DSC TR session, given the ability to ask you to be the detective and guide the deep subconscious to find and work on the most relevant underlying karmic events, would a request like the following be effective: “Source Creator, guide the deep subconscious to identify and work on the most important healing opportunities in the current life to address issues that are 1) an imminent threat to life; 2) an ongoing or imminent threat to health; 3) an ongoing or imminent threat to wellbeing and stability; 4) likely to undermine happiness in a significantly damaging way; 5) likely to shorten lifespan; 6) other important high-level needs Creator can identify?”

We think this is an excellent idea, in the absence of other meaningful information to provide greater specificity, and is far better than the open-ended descriptions of working on the greatest fear, the most troubling issue, the greatest impediment to moving forward, and so on. Those are still subjective and we have discussed the pros and cons with you previously. So here you are providing defining criteria to clarify the relative importance so healing attention is given to things of high-level benefit and for the current life as a priority. This is in keeping with the client's desire for an improved life that is ongoing. Few have a wider perspective about the big picture and are concerned about subsequent lives unless they have studied our teachings, but even so they may still have a personal preference to have their current life repaired first. That is only natural and even if this list were all one worked with, and applied healing diligently to someone who was able to have the majority of current life issues healed, it would still allow moving beyond the current life to the wider future because those would be important high-level needs from Creator's perspective. So there may be additional tweaking of the wording, as you are already considering in asking the question in this channeling session and as might be suggested by others, to add or modify categories. This again is a compromise in wanting to do things in a generic way, and that has many potential uses. As you know, many things can be brewing, still not in the awareness of the clients at all, because no symptoms have yet occurred, but could happen imminently and be a quite severe downturn and challenge, and an even lethal outcome if something is not done, so this is an effective way to address applying meaningful prophylactic benefit with ongoing healing sessions.