What prompted Hillary Clinton to publicly pronounce that former presidential candidate, Jill Stein, and current democrat candidate for president, Tulsi Gabbard, are both “Russian assets,” being in effect, traitorous spies?

This level of rhetoric making such accusations has not been on display since the McCarthy era and is essentially unprecedented at this level from someone with her background in particular. The fact it has happened is a testament to the ability of the Anunnaki to do a mind control manipulation to make her believe what she is saying. That is the danger here, not that mudslinging can’t work, but that when people have an inability to assess their own conduct and the choices they seem to be making, they are no longer in control of themselves. They are marching to a different drummer that is not human and desiring humanity to suffer. This is not what you want in a national leader. The fact this is not obvious on its face that something is deeply wrong is because everyone is being manipulated subliminally to believe what she is saying. So it will only be those leaning in a different political direction who may reject this as being of importance and will take an opposing view, but all those who sympathize with her and her party will likely believe there is something to the notion and that this has been as much as proven with respect to President Trump already in spite of the three year effort to prove the case that has failed to do so. That is of no real consequence because all along the way the investigation to nail down the details of the assumed Russian collusion was being reinforced by mind control manipulation to incorporate those beliefs within American citizens. So many, to this day, cannot unbelieve the original charges and will accept whatever they are told by the programmers because it fits within their range of believability as they are a creature of the culture and have the left-leaning perspective to begin with. The mind control programming is done very cleverly to provide something for each opposing view and this will create an effective belief incorporation on either one side of an argument or the other. The interlopers have no particular desire to support one or another themselves. They only want to see conflict and that is served by having factions at war with one another, each holding deeply ingrained and rigid beliefs in the certitude of their thinking. This they put in place themselves and the people are only marching to the tune they are calling.