What explains the discrepancies between Las Vegas mass killer, Stephen Paddock’s, channeled comments and the physical evidence: 1) lack of blood at the scene, 2) evidence for multiple shooters from many eyewitness accounts, 3) the inconsistent stories from LEO and 4) witness deaths that were written off as coincidence by the Light Being Paddock – these are only the obvious ones?

The reason the discrepancies were there is because the discrepancies are quite real and they themselves tell an important story. The light being Paddock was being truthful in what was said. This was from his perspective, which was not one of omniscience or perfection in all regards, but was still quite accurate for the most part. Keep in mind that this was a fairly new re-arrival to the light and there is still an ongoing period of readjustment to things and this creates some potential difficulties in keeping things straight energetically. The major problem with the so-called evidence is its mixed reliability. This will sort out better through time. There are many examples where claims are made about damning evidence or exculpatory evidence that later proved to be fallacious, so it is premature to draw hard and fast conclusions here, but it is also true that witnesses are unreliable and this is made worse by mind control manipulation to create the impression of more dire circumstances around an event of this kind. This fuels doubt, uncertainty, and discord by all who hear the differing accounts and this serves the darkness because it plays into the overall agenda of keeping humans off balance and not trusting their own institutions. It is not that they are running the world and doing so imperfectly, they are running the world imperfectly on purpose and wish to do it all the more so. Anything they can manipulate and alter and leave people disenchanted, disenfranchised, disappointed, and doubting the trustworthiness of government officials serves the darkness. This will be routine from now on, that even when a crime is manipulated to happen and there is a clear perpetrator with a clear motive and agenda, there may well be secondary rounds of conflicting accounts that raise doubts about whether others participated, and so on. This keeps everyone second-guessing things and pointing fingers and keeps the fear level high. This is quite clear in the Paddock case. If people feel there were other shooters, they certainly have not been identified and apprehended which leaves one or more other crazed killers on the loose. This serves the darkness to promote such an idea and it was not the intention of the light being Paddock to condone or add any additional concerns beyond what he himself was responsible for. And so that was the context for him of the channeling for the most part. Keep in mind that specificity is always a critical factor in everything and every exchange and will continue to be, and this will sometimes leave loose ends, but in such cases, the unresolved questions can be re-asked and a further explanation sought, so that would be always our recommendation. You do not have to live with uncertainty and doubt. If you bring this up, we can help lead you through the threads in the chain of events to see where the truth lies.