This is not for beginners even though they might be passionate and eager to plunge in and take on anything. That is often the enthusiasm of the young as well, who can get in over their heads at times, assuming they are all grown-up and ready for anything. Their enthusiasm can overextend them beyond their current reach. This is not meant to throw cold water on the whole idea. This is true of many endeavors and is simply prudence that is understood and accepted in all professions, that you don’t send the apprentice out alone to take on a very demanding job but do so under the watchful eye of a superior to safeguard things, and so forth, or simply defer such duties until further seasoned and truly ready to soar—that is the analogy we would make in taking on the tougher customers with the LHP. This is not stated as part of the primary teachings but we safeguard the practitioner to the extent we can for any weakness or shortcomings, to give them the benefit of the doubt to extend their reach as far as we can within the rules even though there might be some inner weakness on occasion.
And by the same token, if their personal security is weak, we may defer some of the more demanding targets to allow that to be worked on by others for a time until the newbie is fully road-ready and can stand on their own, and not be vulnerable as they go about doing the session. So practitioners will not likely get into trouble, the major risk is their work may fall short because we may have to step aside and not take on certain challenges they are not fully equipped to handle at first, and that is because of the built-in safety requests within the Protocol itself. So there are not great dangers usually for practitioners, no matter what they encounter and attempt, as long as they are not reckless and are taking shortcuts, to not make the safety requests carefully at the outset and follow the Protocol faithfully—being conscientious and respectful of the seriousness of the undertaking and following procedures will keep them safe and they will do just fine.
The place where danger could enter in is with someone new to the work who is not quite ready to command a powerful enough intention and level of belief to have their safety requests fully acted on. This could leave them vulnerable to observation by interlopers seeing they were doing an intuitive outreach and coming to take a closer look, and potentially capitalizing on that weakened state to make mischief or worse. This is when tickling the tiger by going after high-level targets, in particular, would be inadvisable because that could call forth a large backlash as a reprisal because it would be seen as an affront to their authority. They truly believe the lower astral plane is their realm, and that they control it and will want to fight back if anyone intrudes on their turf, so to speak. Almost all the time with experienced practitioners, their work will be virtually invisible to the interlopers because they are under divine shielding and protection as the Protocol session commences, and the work will be carried out behind the scenes, in effect, by the divine realm in a way that is invisible to the interlopers, and the requests to the divine cannot be detected bringing that about. So the practitioner is shielded the whole time and the consequences of the session are impossible to trace back to the originator, so there is no need for inordinate fear here.
The only safety concern applies to people who have a faulty understanding of the Protocol and what the various steps are intended to do and so will not be mounting the proper intention for them to be enacted, or if they are still too uncertain and their belief quotient is not fully supporting the full degree of protection inherent in the requests, they could get into trouble taking on too much and be putting themselves at risk. Most people attracted to doing healing work of this kind will have sufficient belief to do fine from the outset with respect to personal safety and, as we said, we can make allowances to ensure this for the newcomers until they have their sea legs, so to speak, and they can do fine without any extra handholding. The only time we might have difficulty is if they bite off more than they can chew with high-level targets, specifically, and then that is when we might have to let some consequences happen if they are being overambitious with respect to their capabilities and are not truly ready but naming specific targets to be taken on. When they make a request, we may have to let them engage and then we would be playing catch‑up with respect to what might happen. This will only happen in rare circumstances if people are following the advice given during the training, to work up to larger targets and issues as experience grows.
Please login or Register to submit your answer