What are the potential health consequences of ultrasound examinations of the developing fetus as done routinely to check for gross abnormalities, determining sex, and satisfying parental desire to see their baby? Is this linked to autism in any way, or does it sensitize the infant to have negative reactions to subsequent vaccination as some suspect?

There can be widespread damaging effects on many cells and tissues within the body of the fetus and that is because of the gross exposure overall as the ultrasound imaging is performed. It is a gross tool exposing a wide area of the body totally, so the consequences will depend on the duration, the level of intensity at the point of delivery, which is a function of the orientation and angle—how the fetus is being carried within the womb, the thickness of the upper layers of the mother’s body, the amount of fluid in the amniotic sac, and so on, because the energy is a function of distance from the source and the nature of the intervening materials that will absorb some of the energy being emanated from the ultrasound equipment itself. But we can tell you that depending on the nature of the conditions at the time of the procedure in any individual case, there are many variables influencing the outcome—all of the physical characteristics as just described in general, as well as the age of the fetus, the inherent makeup genetically governing vulnerability to insult, and the karmic history of both infant and mother, as karma will seek a way to manifest, so any potential risk can be a vehicle to create misfortune in some individuals more than others. So we can tell you that a high percentage of the injuries will eventually be repaired in most cases, even injuries to the brain can become less and less of concern because the tissues throughout the body, including the brain, will be in a very rapid growth phase, so injured cells will soon become a minority with the overall growth of the baby. This is a saving grace but does not override the potential concerns here. When a very harmful source of energy is being directed at a developing fetus, things can go wrong, and even cause loss of viability and a stillborn child down the line if the vulnerability is too great, and the number of examinations excessive compared to the average. There are potential influences on cognitive function that can indeed be compounded by other sources of injury capable of producing a deficit. So this could come into play with a difficult delivery, for example, where there were a period of anoxia from impaired circulation or a prolonged delivery where there is some compromise due to the status of the mother’s cardiovascular system, and so on. As you know, autism is largely a consequence of extraterrestrial manipulation, but there can be cognitive impairment from other causes as well, and this can happen from ultrasound examinations. It is unlikely to result in a severe autistic state but could produce some mild abnormalities that would be considered to be on that spectrum. The issue of vaccines is a consequence of bodily rejection of too great an insult when these vaccinations are administered to excess, and here too, the insults can compound so prior ultrasound exposure that causes some cellular damage could be worsened by the reaction to all the foreign insult from over‑vaccination. Doing too many antigens in close dosing intervals, as is common practice, will compound the injury and can leave lasting damage, so this possibility is of concern. As we said previously, the Chinese are correct in recommending that ultrasound imaging not be done at all, except for compelling reasons.