The general programming done in a subliminal fashion to beam messages directly into the subconscious—piggybacking on all forms of media, music, radio, television programming—is designed as a kind of catchall. It is a clever interweaving of opposing ideas such that it will attract people of differing persuasions, each for their own reasons, to align with part of the message and be repelled by the other part or vice versa. In this way, they can send a single message and captivate people on the political left and people on the political right and all the while ramp up tension, animosity, and even hatred of one for the other. This is no mean feat to be done in a single message. Normally one is accustomed to seeing propaganda in favor of one perspective, one point of view, and it will be clearly seen by most people to be biased in that direction, but by those already sympathetic to the perspective being supported and promoted, not offensive.
The overall strategy of the Extraterrestrial Alliance is divide and conquer. As such, they seek to drive a wedge between groups of individuals with differing views and this serves to create dissension, discord, friction, animosity, and sometimes warring camps that will actually engage in physical violence against one another. At a minimum, there will be a spectacle created, a preoccupation with a perceived serious matter requiring one’s attention because much seems to be at stake and passions will run high, people will be glued to their speakers listening to the unfolding saga and wanting to champion their cause, and eagerly await an opportunity to look down on their opponents and feel smug and self-satisfaction they are occupying the high ground in an argument. This is all an illusion because both perspectives supported are a distortion, an exaggeration, and are propaganda by their very nature, but this works quite well.
The overarching effectiveness is due to a kind of siren song of complacency interwoven as well. This is an invitation to accept a passive role in things. The messages serve to satisfy the listener, that their needs and values and expectations are being met and there is nothing much they need to do except to enjoy what is unfolding and how the opposition is going to get a day of reckoning, a comeuppance, a good thrashing in the political arena, or whatever may be the case, when in fact it is all an illusion to begin with and often a false narrative from a factual perspective. But what matters is the tone, whether it is positive or negative, whether it is pro or con, and whether the listener belongs to one leaning or the other.
When encouraged to be complacent, it will be accompanied by hearing what one wants to hear in the message that is soothing, that is reassuring and supportive of the listener’s views. That is what makes this combination so highly effective. If it were simply an exposition of political or other perspectives given from an intellectual framework of facts and information, there would not be an invitation to distortion per se, it would all depend on the person’s awareness, ability to focus on the information, and a reasonable built-in database of knowledge with which to, in a sense, fact check what is being offered as a true reality check about whether it makes sense or seems like something is off, something’s not presented, or that something is distorted or being shaped in a way to bypass the discernment most people are capable of exhibiting. When complacent, people are highly forgiving and will be reassured by part of the message, and it will be enough to keep them happy. This is not a normal state of affairs at all, but is a testament to the effectiveness of the technologies used.
Please login or Register to submit your answer