We have a clearer understanding now about extraterrestrial anchor chips, and the ubiquitous microchips people ingest with food and beverages. Can you help us understand what our original request for removal of “alien implants” was taking care of, if it did not address anchor chips and microchips?

This, in fact, was a term used in reference to historical evidence for alien manipulation of abductees, the classic example being the implants inserted physically into the nasal cavity and to be implanted under the skin, but leaving a palpable nodule or device that could be observed on x-ray. This was an older technology that served for quite some time until the advent of more sophisticated diagnostic technologies to detect such things with greater sensitivity and discernment compared to the crude x-rays that primarily will only detect very dense matter like bone, and may not accurately detect things that have a similar density to human tissue because they will not stand out in contrast. With the advent of MRIs, things have changed and so greater sophistication was needed to go to extremes of miniaturization, and to use etheric implants that are wholly undetectable by any existing human technology. This has now become the standard and will enable anyone to pass scrutiny with any kind of fine screening in an attempt to detect alien manipulation. This serves to keep the secret. And so what was needed was for you to have greater awareness of this advance in sophistication so that you could truly obtain a comprehensive clearing regardless of the nature of the device, and how it may have been inserted, and what it represented as an object. So you can preserve the old term because it has utility, indeed, as it will be recognized by many other workers and the healing community who will see its absence as a defect. So there is no harm in retaining it, but to add the greater precision of specifying anchor chips and then microchips to be included will cover all the bases nicely.