We think you are seeing intuitively the true picture here that he is an individual who is quite perceptive and insightful and can see many things intuitively but is being manipulated to go overboard in ways that will, in the end, serve to discredit him more than validate his perspectives. Those who are discerning and looking beyond the screenplay for inner nuggets of truth will be disappointed and disillusioned in the end because some of his assumptions are planted disinformation that is easily countered and disproven. And that is the purpose of all disinformation campaigns, to discredit the exercise of the whistleblower so they will be lumped together as irrational, unreliable, and misguided as a group, when, in fact, many of them are close to the truth and onto things of importance but simply do not have all of the facts at hand yet, but do have something to offer. And if anyone looked at the whole body of information and did a very careful sorting and analysis, they could still learn important things about what is truly happening. But human nature being what it is, no one wants to be in the wrong and especially the recipient of criticism or even ridicule in lining up with the wrong speculations. So that makes his contributions quite mixed, and on balance, more a negative than a positive.
Please login or Register to submit your answer