This is very definitely a deliberate strategy. It is easy to encourage because the older workers with experience and length of service often accrue the largest salaries and other benefits—longer vacation times, and so on. Their expectations grow and there are also liabilities from senescence that can begin to undermine performance and there can be greater liability from ill health attending to aging, so they become more costly to support. But that is what health insurance is for, and need not be a reason to eliminate such individuals from the workforce. But these vulnerabilities are the very things targeted to justify eliminating the older, more experienced hands who are often good leaders and can be a force for change and growth, and add tremendous depth to an enterprise that younger workers cannot match. Given that there are economic incentives to pare down the staff with the largest salary benefits and potential economic cost to the overall budget, subconscious programming is quite effective in influencing high-level administrators and managers to do ruthless budget cutting that takes a human toll on the employee ranks. This is most unfortunate and is both unfair and unethical from a divine perspective because it serves the darkness. This is an even greater wrong and will have karmic consequences for all involved in carrying out such plans.
Please login or Register to submit your answer