Thinking ahead to my webinar this week being on Easter Sunday, it occurred to me I should ask straight out, was the crucifixion of Jesus Christ, in fact, ordered and arranged by the Extraterrestrial Alliance because they saw him as a troublemaker?

This is very much the case. There are people who are killed all the time in today’s world because they rise to prominence in a way that draws the ire of the powers that be watching behind the scenes. They like nothing better than to pull the rug out from under a do-gooder—any kind of humanitarian who receives accolades and whom people wish to emulate, particularly if their good deeds might interfere with a plan of the Extraterrestrial Alliance to cause human deprivation and degradation of circumstances. They cannot do this to each and every individual, but it is a favorite sport and exercise of them to find ways to undermine such individuals to cause their demise or to sideline them whether through enticing them with forbidden fruit so they are involved in a sexual scandal or some other impropriety, or to engage in pleasurable but self‑destructive habits like drinking or drug use. They may well promote some kind of business arrangement that turns out to have an unsavory aspect to sully their reputation or there may simply be an accident arranged to finish them off altogether. There are many such strategies employed so people will not see a pattern. When Jesus Christ came along and was widely recognized as being special, this was noticed and the Extraterrestrial Alliance earmarked him for destruction. As it turned out, that was fairly easy to arrange because in those days the Roman Empire had absolute iron-fisted control over everyone and everything and all that it took was for a decree to be made by the local ruling figure. There were no fair trials by a jury of peers, and so on, that needed to demonstrate the breaking of a law in a flagrant fashion. So this was essentially a political calculation to weigh the benefit to the stability of the Extraterrestrial Alliance and its aims versus causing some consternation and possible unrest of the populace because of his growing following. In this case, it was the fact he was getting attention and a growing following that was viewed as his transgression and the need to eliminate him as a potential political figure, in their view, and that was his undoing.