Thinking about the implications here in using deep subconscious channeling with HMR, would piling up and externalizing the affect for each Level 1 Reframe add anything significant to the healing, or is that always accomplished using the guided imagery for the reframe as carried out currently?

Here again, an extra measure of thoroughness would be achieved through using both steps within the Level 1. The ideal would be to externalize the affect through a pileup and then to rework the scene to devise an improved outcome followed by a color replacement representing that change and moving that through the body as well. This will effect a greater degree of healing across the board. Keep in mind there will be many linked episodes that are representing a kind of resonance with the dilemmas of the particular trauma scenes being revisited by choice of the mind itself, but they are by no means the whole story of what a person has lived through. As you know from your DNA ThetaHealing work, there are many beliefs that are linked in a hierarchy and some of them will fall away when major negative self-limiting beliefs are replaced, because in order to do that will necessitate cutting free others of a subsidiary nature. Even though not central in their impact and importance to a person’s suffering, they will contribute, and anything negative that is removed is all to the good. The same applies with HMR scenes and the metaphors held within the body. There might be one scene emerging for description purposes by the mind, starting from the body metaphor as an affect bridge to probe the memory for the details, but there may be many other episodes of a similar nature that resonate and are interconnected energetically through shared cordings, and so on. This is what the Level 2 Reframe is designed to address as a way of making up for the inability to revisit, potentially, countless scenes of insult and injury, even from the current lifetime, especially when someone has had a tough childhood and subjected to chronic abuse, neglect, or suffering, perhaps from a series of physical illnesses that impaired their life experience. But that does not mean a superficial treatment does all that can be accomplished, that is why going to the extra trouble of using a reframing step, through revising the episode in each and every instance for each and every memory within storage as well as externalizing the affect through piling up the associated unhappy feelings, will be worth the trouble. You will see this play out with your client work, that there will be a more noticeable reduction in the symptoms, and reaching that level of benefit will come much quicker when you implement this extra thoroughness. If you think about the implications of doing this enhancement with both Level 1 and Level 2 Reframes, what this will do is to almost guarantee a fuller benefit from the Level 2 that will make up for visiting fewer individual discrete episodes to achieve a Level 1 Reframe because many, many associated events can be rounded up in the Level 2 and given a very full healing, and will compensate for perhaps not having enough time to do the same number of Level 1 Reframes in a given session.