There is the karmic problem of returning a response to a perpetrator with a dramatically different makeup from the initial victim triggering the karmic debt. For instance, the same shove delivered to one individual is an annoyance but breaks the bones of someone frail. How would this debt be handled? Does karma wait for the perpetrator to be born frail? But even if frail, a psychopathic personality might absorb such a shove very differently than the initial victim, even if the broken bones are the same or similar. Then there is the dilemma of the first victim having a karmic recurrence of the shove themselves. So do we have both the perpetrator and victim getting the SAME karmic response? OR does the perpetrator simply return as another perpetrator and the victim as well, to again be a victim? What can Creator tell us?

Life is very complex and, accordingly, the karmic consequences, entanglements, and paths to a rebalancing and healing will be every bit as complex and varied. So all of your proposed scenarios may well happen even for the downstream consequences of a single traumatic experience. It is commonplace for perpetrators and victims to find one another again and again in the course of a lifetime, and perhaps link up as parent and child, husband and wife, boss and employee, and so on, or return in a series of lifetimes in such close proximity so they can reenact a karmic drama in the role of perpetrator and victim. The parties may even switch roles as a way of working on that karma so the perpetrator gets a taste of their own medicine at the hands of their victim, now a perpetrator, turning on them and harming them in a similar way. The Law of Karma might seize upon random events in proximity to sources of danger and cause accidents to happen as a karmic consequence that matches, in some way or another, a prior experience. So one time it might be harm coming from a personal act of hostility and another time an environmental hazard that causes an impairment or inconvenience that is a karmic penalty, nonetheless, of comparable impact in harming a person. The Law of Karma is an intelligent mechanism for meting out energy that is a match to prior events in some fashion and will take into account all of the conditions, circumstances, and participants. Even if many, many individuals played a role, there will be ways that it arranges to provide an impetus to heal what has come before, no matter how complicated. If you think about the implications here for such a multiparty participation in something that ends in tragedy, each and every one of those individuals will be linked karmically to that event in the akashic records and its energetic signature, and so all will be corded together in complex ways and all will need similar healing for their role and what happened to them and what they caused to happen to others. So it is very likely that there will be much going on that is unpleasant, as a fact of life for many, because history has caused so many difficulties for so many individuals, and all of the perpetrators, including the dark spirits and extraterrestrials, will need to be arranged, through the Law of Karma, to once again do their thing as an opportunity to work on reducing the negative impact, if possible, through healing. This reality is quite sobering because it means once you engage with someone in an event that causes harm to anyone, you will not escape it and its inevitable return, courtesy of the Law of Karma, to bring you once again together with a similar event and even the same players many times. There is no way out of this and, in fact, one of the traditional but poor choices for those who commit suicide is they will return in a new incarnation to a new lifetime as someone likely to be suicidal once again, so there is no real escape except through healing. That is the business of the Law of Karma, to create imperatives for everyone.