The viewer continues: “Was Sylvia Browne divinely inspired or deceived? To what extent were her teachings accurate?”

All human beings are both divinely inspired and deceived, some to the point any divine inspiration will be disregarded automatically and discounted. She was much more divinely inspired than deceived, so many of her teachings were accurate as far as they went, but suffered more from being incomplete than being false altogether. It is very difficult for psychics to be accurate because they are dealing with an ephemeral source and signal that is quite subtle and fragile to begin with to receive and maintain. Channelers need to have broad knowledge and much inner creativity so they can envision an extension of what they know, and then be flexible and open and allowing to having those speculations confirmed or revised by divine feedback as an ideal mode of operating. So, much of the ability to be accurate depends on what one brings to the party, so to speak—low-level questions will get low-level answers, lofty questions will get lofty answers, and so on. The problem of corruption deliberately, is a serious one. There are prominent channelers who are reaching a divine level source but not asking deep and penetrating questions, because they are corrupted by mind control to be complacent, and not interested in pursuing many, many things of importance. So, many things are simply never on the table for discussion, and that was true in her case as well. Her teachings have been a starting point for many and, as such, are worthy, but there were still many things to learn she could not get to, and that is what you most need to know.