Studies are showing more and more evidence of increased anxiety, depression, and suicide of children due to the Covid-19 lockdowns and having only remote learning, with social deprivation. Is there more to the story? Were they being mind-controlled to undermine them psychologically?

You are seeing this intuitively with great insight and awareness that there is more to the story. You have been puzzling at this all along, how odd it seems that remote learning seems to be such a failure when you have often envisioned remote learning as having some genuine advantages over the school setting, to escape the regimentation and the potential dangers of people thrust together coming from quite varied backgrounds, many of whom are corrupted and unstable and used as a kind of human weapon to target the weaker children. In some ways, computer learning can be quite advantageous and more effective than a classroom, where success will depend on the vagaries of individual teachers and their talent, dedication, and level of effort they put into it. Your disquiet was in seeing this failure as a red flag, that there was more to the story. Part of it, as you rightly perceived, is that much of the school curriculum is poorly constructed and ill-advised, in not being age-appropriate or the most engaging and stimulating way to inspire and encourage growth, learning, and creativity. But in addition, over the span of time, this was used as a deliberate opportunity to target large numbers of young people to discourage them and undermine them emotionally and psychologically, so that the remote learning would, in fact, backfire and cause a learning deficit at a minimum and psychological and emotional turmoil and potential for even rebellion or suicide. Those are not normal outcomes from programmed learning done via video recordings or a live instructor. So this was an intentional additional form of attack on human society to undermine the young.