Solar panels and wind turbines don’t return enough energy to replace the energy cost to provide them, particularly considering the necessary storage costs to fully utilize the output. Moreover, the estimates I have read are that for the U.S. to replace its total energy needs with renewables would require using 25-50% of all land in the United States. Is the goal of the environmentalists to replace fossil fuels and nuclear energy with renewables like biomass, wind, and solar power truly unachievable? Is this a folly created and supported through mind control to encourage costly human failure?

Here you are drilling down into the details, at least in a general way, and we support all of these propositions and conclusions as being a valid perspective. This is something truly not ready for prime time and might never be, given other alternatives. We are not in favor of useless squandering of any resources, but you are not close to using what is available planet-wide in terms of fossil fuels, let alone nuclear energy, and that is not to say they cannot be replaced, for that is an option always available through the work of the Almighty. We can simply create more oil if that is the best way to support humanity. In actuality, you only have a relatively short time yet where you will need such things to support human life. One way or another, you will be moving on through ascension, or annihilation. But there is no reason to further punish humanity with restricting readily available resources based on faulty thinking and promises from a political stance based on a manipulated message and mind control generated confusion and false thinking.