Sixty percent of college graduates today are women. Women are increasingly filling managerial roles and displacing men in numerous professional occupations such as law and medicine. Men, by and large, have no issues “dating down” and entering relationships with women who earn much less than they do, and who are even unemployed altogether. Whereas, the opposite is almost never true for successful women. Overwhelmingly, they hold out and say yes only to men who make as much or preferably more than they do, who are taller than they are (or at least not shorter), and more “successful and worldly,” however they might personally define that. The result is that more and more women are chasing fewer and fewer “qualified” men. They are literally pricing themselves out of the dating market. What is Creator’s perspective?

On a surface level, this simply seems supportable from the standpoint women are more discerning, more demanding, more sophisticated, less easily swayed by things like an inner sex drive to leap at any opportunity, and then perhaps get enmeshed in a relationship that might still grow enough over time to lead to marriage and stability, but instead women hang back waiting for that ultimate high-value target to come along before they buy-in, so to speak. To some extent, this fits with inner makeup of the female who has larger goals and concerns geared, innately, towards building a family and having a suitable environment for child rearing as a very strong inner drive, based on a large historical precedent and fulfilling many basic needs of their soul, to be a nurturer of the young, because this is Creator's Plan and the fulfillment of personal destiny as well, to participate in the program. But there are many successful life partners where there is an asymmetry and it works just fine depending on the couple. This natural inclination to be cautious, bide one's time, and look carefully before they leap, by females, is exaggerated, through mind control manipulation, to convince them, through the inculcation of beliefs, they must not settle for less, "less" being "something average," and that is the distortion here, being that average is okay, it is acceptable, because love transcends the material. When people are truly in love, nothing else really matters. Women can get ego gratification being married to a doctor, for example, which will impress their friends, but their lives might be much less rewarding in other respects, to be in a partnership with a partner who is much less at home, less able to get away, cannot be spontaneous because they are on call, and so on. Whereas, if that same woman married a plumber or electrician, they could still have a comfortable enough lifestyle, and a totally devoted partner much more of the time, with much greater flexibility to truly share their life with them. Love looks beyond the surface characteristics of things, even physical appearance, but certainly family background and economic status. While not insignificant in value, such things are not the key for love to happen or to be satisfying. So we can tell you with certainty that men and women, individually, are groomed to thwart love relationships from blooming through cultivating their beliefs, and thus their thoughts, feelings, and actions, in particular, to make things less likely for them to find a partner. This keeps many more people on the sidelines than would otherwise be the case. It is not normal for so many people well into adulthood, to not be paired up. It is not simply a consequence of, in earlier eras, being without birth control methods that were reliable so the dangers of a very early sexual awakening led to many marriages forced on the parties by an unexpected pregnancy. People were simply free to fall in love, and sought love as a high priority, and put that at a premium before even having stable careers, and so forth, but somehow were able to work things out because it was love that was most important. And if people had to settle for a less demanding and rewarding career, because of family obligations, they accepted the trade-off, in most cases, because it was a greater reward, in any event, than making money or being in a position of authority could offer.