She continues: “If yes, do we need to be careful with sharing information about the Lightworker Healing Protocol? Will it benefit her if we tell the truth about what she experienced?”

It may be of benefit to her but that is not your responsibility to see to with regard to having a long-term interaction and discussion. There is a duty to warn those you see who are at risk from the interlopers. Beyond that, there is not much you can do further, it is up to the person involved to take action of some kind if they have the wherewithal. At a minimum, it would be highest and best to do prayers for her benefit and any work that can be arranged through the LHP, for her to be given a session and her family as well, as this would be a blessing to get some high-level healing launched, and that can be a long‑term benefit in helping to keep them safe and eventually wean them away from this program. To make this a cause for alarm may have repercussions simply because it is putting them on notice you are thinking strange things about them they may not be willing to believe or accept, and will see you as being perhaps unstable and even a danger to them through making wild accusations. So this is always a delicate matter; the way to approach it would be simply to bring up the discussion you have had about their UFO observation to relate that this may well mean there is some ongoing observation or even interaction with ETs, and that it would be a good idea to do prayer work just as a matter of course to request assistance for safety—that is a fairly benign exchange and is not pressuring or raising probing questions. There is no need to tell her all you know about the subject. If you do have a detailed interaction with her, professing inside knowledge and wanting to intervene on her behalf, that could become known by the Extraterrestrial Alliance and give them reason to look at you more closely and attempt to manipulate you. So there is a need for prudence here and not take undue risks by being too forthright with an attempt to persuade. That may well backfire in any case as the victims of abduction are programmed to discount any subsequent recollection of memory fragments from the encounters as well as to disregard any discussion from outside parties who occasionally do witness and recall something, or who may want to persuade that individual, who is a person of interest, to research the matter further and maybe get outside help from investigators, and so on. That could cause a backlash but the victims of the abduction themselves will very, very likely dismiss any third-party commentary as really not applying to them, and conclude there is nothing really for them to do differently in their lives because there is no substance to the issue, as they have inner beliefs to this effect to create a cover for the clandestine manipulation.