Please clarify the channeled answer you gave us about the overall healing achieved by the group of channelers attempting to emulate their leader who has an uncommon ability to launch LHP sessions with a code word. We asked, “How effective, on average, are members of this group in getting healing equivalent to live sessions?” And you told us: “We would say that the effectiveness, on average, is about 50% of what would be achieved were all those sessions done live…” Did this really mean to indicate that their code word sessions are still half as effective as live sessions, so that given they can launch hundreds of code words they accomplish far more than doing live sessions only? Or was the answer meant to convey that their total effort, the total healing output for the time expended, even though they might launch hundreds of code word sessions, ended up getting only 50% of what they could have accomplished just doing what live sessions they could for the same amount of time spent?

Unfortunately, it is the latter explanation and not the former. This confusion is an unfortunate interpretation of a somewhat clumsily worded channeled answer to the intention of your question, to give a true picture of how that group is performing as a whole, with or without their code word practices substituted by live sessions. The reason for the somewhat clumsy description was because, at the time you asked that question, you were not aware of how many hundreds of code word sessions were being conducted overall and the various kinds of augmentation strategies the group employees in the belief it will compound the energy and result in much greater session numbers. The only fair comparison is truly what your original question was designed to ferret out: given all that group is doing, no matter how they are doing it, what is the total benefit achieved compared to what that group would have accomplished if they had taken the same amount of practitioner time and devoted that to doing one or more live sessions. That is the only fair way to compare the two scenarios, the amount of time and energy devoted by the practitioners when including code word launchings, and when not. So the interpretation is not correct that each code word session is 50% as powerful as a full live session. We gave the truth of things, but along with that somewhat clumsy wording, out of necessity in following rules of engagement here, as no one had asked you directly to vet their group process for code words and code word augmentation. That is why you asked the additional question for your own clarification, allowing us to make clear that if someone is launching sessions who cannot support code word use to begin with, no matter how many code words they launch personally, each will have the energy of zero and adding zero to zero, no matter how many times it is done, will always sum up to zero. So, once again, to give the true state of affairs we must, first of all, point out that regardless of your detailed knowledge of the workings of the group, they are doing all their work with us and through us. So we know in detail what each person is doing, the collective efforts, how they are doing it, and how we respond on the divine end to carry forth the requests to bring about healing. Because, after all, whether a live session or a code word session, it is an appeal to us, and that is what we handle each and every time, or not, as the case might be. So what we are telling you is, that the leader is a special case and his code word sessions will equal the original session used to create his code word. Beyond that, the attempts to get fancy may apply to him to a limited extent, but not in the way he thinks if he is getting energy from others who are not as capable, having a lower spiritual reach. So the capable healers at the top will be doing meaningful work, but the many others who are launching code word sessions will be creating wasted energy that will go nowhere and will have been wasted time and effort, as it will not add to the healing. So the figure we gave of 50% achievement was a broad summary of all the group is doing, compared to what it could do if it were time spent, individually and collectively, performing whatever number of live sessions could be mounted in the same total time devoted. And even though many fewer sessions could be done because of the length of time needed to do it live, that would achieve more for most of the practitioners than launching many code word sessions where their individual energies do not contribute, whatsoever, to the total. There is no workaround for this, to get blood out of a stone. This is not a judgment but simply reporting the truth in how the energies work, or do not, depending on the makeup of the would-be healer in each instance. So we stand by all we have said, that only a few people can use code words for large-scale healing, and that cannot be simply taught or emulated by following someone who has that capability. Nor will such individuals necessarily even understand what gives them that authority and prowess, so their efforts to instruct others will likely be misguided because it is not a teachable capability, it is an issue of the inherent makeup as configured prior to birth that will determine at what functional level someone can interact with the divine realm in that fashion. Going back to the beginning of the discussion, this leader was told he was special but that it was inadvisable to encourage others to follow that practice, and that even doing so would be a karmic misstep because it would give false encouragement and end up taking away meaningful contributions to the whole. And that is true of anyone who adopts the practice or invites others to do likewise. As with all actions, anything that you do that moves you away from divine alignment is a karmic misstep. It will detract from your progress and may incur a penalty. As much as your channel hates being the bearer of bad tidings, he has been asked by someone wanting further clarity, and is only bearing his responsibility to do what he always does, to make an honest effort to seek divine guidance for further clarification and to report the findings, like it or not, when it is important for the questioner to know the answer.