My client, who you told us lost her husband to medical negligence, was given the name of an attorney who pursues malpractice claims on contingency, so she has a chance of getting insurance money if she signs an agreement to investigate her husband’s death while under hospital care for knee surgery. Would this be a karmic transgression on her part to seek a human-level restitution? To me, she certainly seems deserving as he left her with nothing, and her getting some money to survive with, given her targeted status and fragile health, would be a kind of karmic repayment from wrongdoers. What is Creator’s perspective?

We agree with this analysis, that she is quite deserving of getting a break from the system that is so heavily corrupt and has harmed her more than helped her over the years. Not that the same individuals were involved with the husband and his untimely passing, but in a sense, the institution of healthcare across the board is only possible because the insurance company indemnifies them from personal liability. So no matter how much harm they might cause, whether through negligence or ignorance, they will have already bought their way out of the dilemma because they will likely not be called to account, and even if they are, likely will not be sanctioned personally. The hospital will overlook the problem with perhaps a warning, and the insurance companies will laugh all the way to the bank because they are never in danger of going broke, given the fee structure required to be insured in the first place. In a sense, the insurance companies are like an apex predator living off of the gains of the predatory healthcare system. So we do not see your client at any personal risk of an undue karmic backlash.