She is correct in her assumption about Mary's lofty status and her role, both in the past as depicted in the Bible in being so close to the miracle of Christ's presence in the living, and her continued actions and advocacy for human through the ages from the light. All are a positive force for good. There is nothing negative in her history or in her makeup or her actions. Anything to the contrary is disinformation from Internet ignorance, prejudicial thinking, or corruption from those who would undermine the biblical account of Christ's appearance and the intention behind his mission life and all those who helped him to bring it about. She is quite a fine healer in her own right and has been instrumental in sessions conducted by the channeler which he has witnessed personally, seeing her in action.
Please login or Register to submit your answer