As we have explained to you before via Archangel Jophiel, who you channeled, taking on the blood of another is not a good idea. There are many adverse consequences that would not be predicted by human. There are limits in the benefit to prolonging life under current circumstances, so when an exit point presents itself, it is an opportunity rather than a danger or liability. So the fact there is no death and that the earth is a highly difficult and troubling environment, and the alternative is to be in bliss and return to a state of joy, the attractiveness of going to extra lengths to prolong the life in the physical takes on a different perspective.
The disadvantages are many when blood is transfused into another individual. When blood is transfused from one human into another, there is a transfer of their energy via the DNA contained within the cells. This causes disruption and confusion and a mixing of soul energies, and this is inherent in the question being asked. The confusion is that the blood coming from the donor carries with it a very strong energetic cording to them, and that cording will remain. So the recipient of the transfusion will be corded to their donor and there will be an energy transfer that continues on an indefinite basis as long as the energy of that blood remains within the body.
There will be a link beyond to the akashic record of the donor as well. This can add on additional negativity and opportunities for clashing of energies through a kind of confusion, because there will appear to the system to be two soul origins present, and this will cause mixed signals and some things may be mishandled as a consequence. There will be things out of phase because individuals are on different paths and have different timelines for various things to happen. The precise details are beyond your understanding at present, but there are many types of dysregulation and a loss of optimal function from the misalignment and the confusion. The exact implications cannot be summarized easily, because they will be very much case-specific, as people differ and there are so many varied scenarios possible.
Some donors will be more compatible than others from the standpoint of their soul characteristics and the energies within the akashic record that will be impinging on the recipient from the presence of their tissue. These will not necessarily harm longevity but can, and therefore this trade-off would be useful to consider. The consequences are usually not dire or acute, but will play out over time and therefore the cause and effect relationship will not be apparent because the transfusion will have its immediate term benefits, and then the other phenomena as a consequence of the downside will play out over a much longer period of time and will not be associated with the transfer of tissue between parties.
Even though the cells will not survive indefinitely and will eventually die and be replaced, the energies of their origin will still be present and linked to the recipient. This is a manifestation of consciousness that is involved, and that is linked down to the quantum level and does not depend on intact cell membranes and on-going functional activity in an organized fashion. So the downside will not fade over time. It will always be present as a link to the donor.
Please login or Register to submit your answer