Nicola Staff asked 10 months ago
Even though bold and sweeping in the pronouncements and the implications, this might well be achieved at least in the near-term. You are seeing the deeper issue here, that the overall liability and limitation, in the rosy scenario described, is it depends totally on the ready availability of electrical power, not to mention the charging stations that will have to be paid for and installed and widely available in larger and larger numbers for practical convenience. At the present time, the current electrical grid cannot support a wholesale abandonment of gas-powered vehicles by electric vehicles alone. The timeline for allowing an eventual conversion is difficult to predict because that will require a massive capital investment in the infrastructure, and it is uncertain, as we see, that governments will be able to subsidize the investment needed through tax revenues alone.
As with all things involving energy policy and environmental imperatives, there is a vast distortion underway to make climate change suppression the number one goal even when the proposed remedies fly in the face of reason, practicality, and technical feasibility. So what you are seeing is genuine technological innovation that has a sinister side to it. You have these advancements, courtesy of the Extraterrestrial Alliance, because it provides a seeming answer to critics of the Environmental Movement who are leery of the EV Revolution. There is a time-honored truism, "If it’s not broken, don’t fix it." To abandon an existing infrastructure of refining crude oil to make gasoline, and distribute it widely everywhere it is needed in a reasonably safe and efficient manner, is something that ought to demand very careful analysis, learned opinion, and a wide array of expert consultation. This is rarely done because it is prevented from happening. Humans are not allowed to look before they leap as a cultural phenomenon that is engineered to happen over and over through mind control manipulation.
Every new technological revolution seems to satisfy a basic human need and adds new capability and personal power. For example, the cell phone has tremendous advantages as a means of quick communication allowing people to stay connected and have access to enormous amounts of information readily, no matter where they are located, at least in much of the world. But the downside is the technology is a vector for mind control and is highly addicting. So while adding personal convenience, people are also being disempowered by the darkness and do not realize it. The deception being promoted with the "Forever Battery" is to greatly augment dependence on an enormously expensive conversion to green energy and greater and greater dependence on a sole source of power from a fragile infrastructure.
Please login or Register to submit your answer
