Is the book by Michael Shellenberger, “Apocalypse Never,” an accurate and insightful assessment of the misguided influence of the Environmental Movement on mainstream thinking and politics? Is this safe and helpful to recommend to our followers?

We think it is an ideal vehicle to present an accurate profile of the history here, and all that is happening as a consequence of the environmental movement. Your sense, that it is not only bogus but a weaponized assault by the Extraterrestrial Alliance to turn reason and logic on their head, and make humans do exactly the worst thing in answer to their needs for energy, is very perceptive and an important counterpoint needing to be advanced if humanity is to make any progress and not destroy itself. Keep in mind, that is the agenda of the Extraterrestrial Alliance. And this is why so many things that are happening that seem inimical to the best interests of everyone are not only occurring, but are often championed by media and political agendas that use them as a rallying cry and a model to follow, when they are wrongheaded to begin with, and self-destructive in the bargain. This is true of environmentalism across the board, other than the logical need to minimize pollution as an aspect of good stewardship. It is no different on any level of life’s expression, that one needs to attend to housekeeping, to keep things clean, and tidy, to conserve resources and not squander them, to use them wisely, and in the most efficient manner because they are a gift from the Almighty and deserving of respect and need to be cherished and husbanded for the future, and be used with restraint and care in ways that are fair and judicious. But we are talking here of excesses and misguided proposals that start from the need for stewardship but take it to extremes, based on many false assumptions of dire cataclysmic events that doom humanity through the use of natural substances as fuel when such is not the case. This is not a close call. The data are truly on the side of this author. So all he had to do was to have an open mind and unbiased stance with reason, caution, and a bit of skepticism to ask penetrating questions on both sides of the argument, and to have a nose for scholarship to ferret out sources of data that are reliable and not solely those things that are misrepresented and exaggerated while not presenting actual data and evidence, which are the usual tactics used by those with a biased agenda. So we stand behind his work as a very reasonable overview of the landscape here, illustrating with clarity how every aspect of the environmental movement is being misrepresented and deliberately weaponized to work against humanity. It has become a scourge, and with governmental power behind it, a great danger to human progress.