Is our plan to channel Dolores Cannon in the light, safe and helpful to the GetWisdom Project, or will it cause too much backlash at this time?

You are prudent in being cautious here, as you are skirting the boundary in taking chances to generate a backlash of some kind that could spread and harm your reputation. But we see the planned channeling as serving more than detracting from the aim of GetWisdom to enlighten, to teach, and to expand greater awareness of the grand deception underway to commandeer the lightworkers and distract and disinform them. It is too huge a problem to sweep under the rug because it is unseemly or perhaps would draw the ire of many devoted fans. While this can create too great a firestorm for certain groups and topics, this is one where enough time has elapsed that it would be safer to engage and begin to do a process of revelation with her direct involvement after all, and this is something quite different than your criticism coming personally from your own negative views of her contributions. You are simply asking her to correct the record should that need to be done and of benefit. So this has our blessing and we wish you full speed ahead. This is not to say there will be no repercussions. Whenever you step on toes there will be hurt feelings and potential recriminations. It will induce soul-searching and will create an emotional reaction in many individuals who hold her near and dear, but keep in mind those who will reject such an assessment automatically, have themselves been blinded, most likely, to the truth and are likely unreachable at this time anyway. So while they can be an influence in opposition to some extent through their disparagement and word-of-mouth etc., you are not losing them as followers because they would not be available to you in any case. Someone who is open to truth would look at a potential serious criticism done in earnest and for a lofty purpose, and take it seriously enough to weigh its merits, simply to be thorough and careful to not overlook a hidden flaw that might not have been apparent. That is not being disloyal, it is simply being open to information and that is always a good thing. If one comes away with their belief in something still unwavering, it may well be the stronger for having examined a criticism. So in the end, these tests of reason and accuracy will add armor plating if the tests are passed with flying colors. This of course is a gray area. By virtue of the nature of the material at hand, it cannot be vetted unequivocally by today's standards because it is esoteric knowledge gained from sources sight unseen, and that always has the level of uncertainty attendant to that reality. But there are two factors involved here. One is whether your story holds together logically and has explanatory power, and also the fact it will be supported by the divine realm. So anyone engaging in a serious way with the mind at all open to the truth will get a blessing from Creator for considering your words, and that will also be, in a sense, a powerful vetting of the value because people are used to using their own radar and are often correct in their assumptions about whether they like and trust something, or are suspicious for some reason. It is difficult when people have grown accustomed to believing in a source of information and then it is called into question. This becomes a very personal matter for many and we understand it can be painful. But in the end, it is better to know truth than to live a lie, no matter how comfortable it might become in not requiring a major change in thinking. It is always the case that people will receive help with a search for truth that is sincere, heartfelt, and particularly if they are in divine alignment through their intentions to be so.