Is it advisable to include a broad general request for karmic repair in perpetuity and couple it with something more specific like the above so urgent current issues among these important categories are given priority? Will the above general and broad healing requests be as effective as creating a long list of potential problem areas and specific issues to check on?

This would be useful to do because it clearly delineates then the intention of the practitioner to have the high-value matters given special prominence and focus, so that they may be given a higher status and attended to more quickly than might happen when there are many prior mundane things needing attention, and no clear directions given to the divine realm as far as relative importance is concerned. So the two used together would work together quite beautifully. Adding specificity always has some value and we understand the desire here is to streamline things to not have an encyclopedia of potential calamities to be somehow stuffed into the Protocol and become perhaps too unwieldy. There is a pro and a con here with such an approach—when a broad, sweeping, general request is made, this can give the divine realm great latitude as to the applicability and interpretation in an individual circumstance causing suffering to a person. But when there is an encyclopedia of potential dilemmas spelled out to check on and follow, but the particular event in question is not on the list, this might cause the divine realm to stand aside because it has not been requested, whereas many, many others have been. And, in this way, the attempt to be comprehensive can backfire and actually become restrictive, because the intention is then to focus on these things and that can leave many loose ends inadvertently. So between the two strategies, we would recommend having the broad statements and you will do quite nicely because of the charter you are giving, and it will be broad enough but yet contain enough specificity in the sense that what you are asking is implementation of the Protocol in such a way as to address the broad concerns. So that is the source of specificity here. You are not simply making the statement in isolation to fix everything. You are saying to fix everything with these types of tools, with the Lightworker Healing Protocol itself as the foundation of the healing effort. So in that sense, you are simply making a broad mandate for the divine realm to go and look for trouble, to identify what hurts, and then apply whatever healing approach among the options is best suited to repair the damage, and this is why the way you are proposing this will be effective.