It is partially valid, but not sufficiently to be of general value as a strategy. The teachings in question were based on a correct intuitive appreciation for the consequences of negative energies impinging on a person in the form of psychic attacks. It is also true that these need to be dealt with, so this was her way of creating a mechanism that she felt would right the wrongs, so to speak, for example, in sending a countering message to a would-be attacker—one of love, understanding, and a gentle redirecting of things to defuse the attack and hopefully contain the dispute and let it subside on its own. That is a preferable strategy to lashing out, striking back, fighting fire with fire, which will always escalate things and is the worst thing one can do in response to an attack.
What is in error is the assumption one can program the aura to carry out this function to discriminate energetically among energies attempting to penetrate, and then to provide a response with an energetic content of intelligence to constitute a discernible message to the originator of attacking energy. That is overexpecting what is possible by the aura itself. It is a highly refined energetic field with a mix of properties ideally suited for protecting the being. That is its function, but as such it cannot discriminate among many possible messages and their meaning and relative merit. There is a general perception of high vibration versus low vibration, but that is a function of the originator and hence the energetic signature associated with the signal. For very large extremes, the body can do just fine in discriminating among the energies impinging from the environment. So when a would-be attacker sets out to cause injury, if only emotional, or who may be just venting anger but not wanting to cause physical harm, the energy will be inherent with the message and quite discernible by the auric field and it will not be allowed to enter. That is an automatic protection and safeguard that is a normal function.
Those who wish to attack in a clandestine way, have ways to create a more covert type of negativity that may be masked within the energy directed at a person and will slip through and not be detected by the defenses—at least initially. That is a matter for the higher faculties to analyze and come to an understanding about how to see a message coming through. It will be hard for someone from an enemy camp to not arouse suspicion because there will be inevitably something about their energy that will be disquieting at some level, to some parts of a person, and they will be quite careful in evaluating anyone to see if the criterion of safety and innocence is met. To assume one can create an automatic response by wanting this to be so is a false notion. Any such reply would require a high degree of sophistication and it would not serve to have a canned response that is one size for all as there are many different beings and circumstances and issues that arise, so there will need to be a fair degree of communication between any two individuals if one or both parties want something more to happen in response to an exchange of energy.
Please login or Register to submit your answer