In a recent webinar regarding a dog’s injury during surgery, Karl said that if the divine realm had gone back in time and stopped the injury from occurring during the surgery, then the people around the dog would no longer have a memory of the dog ever being paralyzed due to that injury. If that is the case, how is it that when extraterrestrial MAP commanders punish their recruits by killing or injuring them and then use time travel to bring them back to life or healing their injuries, the recruit still has the painful memory of either dying or being injured? Do the ETs have to do a mental manipulation to reinstall the memory?

Because the individual will retain the memory of the future they lived, there is nothing needing to be reinstalled here. This was a misstatement by your channel. In the case of the work done on the dog, we were going back in time, so to do that virtually at the time of surgery itself would, in fact, produce the result that witnesses to the prior surgical aftermath would be carrying a memory of the paralysis. That retention of a memory that conflicts with a redone reality is an example of the so-called Mandela effect, when people remember something happening that conflicts with current reality. The recollection by the family and the doctors of the dog recovering from anesthesia paralyzed is more recent in the current timeline, and more emotionally charged, and therefore the dominant memory that is retrieved. In thinking about what has transpired here, this is particularly so because of its alarming nature, and any experience with a strong emotional consequence is given priority in the memory as to its potential value in remaining accessible as a life lesson, for example. So this overshadows the fact that all of those individuals lived through an uneventful surgical recovery of the dog, but in the past, when there was no complication observed. Because that was a benign occurrence, compared to the trauma of seeing the beloved pet suffering, it is submerged and not necessarily causing any disturbance. If it surfaces, it will be interpreted as simply imagining what would have been preferable, to never go through this scare in the first place, and not perceived as living the experience twice. So in this case, the Mandela effect memory has an impact because of its proximity in the timeline of events, and as is often the case, a more shocking nature, making it indelible. In the case of an extraterrestrial encounter as a trainee or a working member of the Mercenary Army Program, when disciplined in such a severe way as to threaten their life or cause disfigurement and then taking them back in time to undo it, they are actually taking that individual back in time, but because they have already experienced the future, they will have carried the memories with them because they experienced it personally and directly themselves. So once something is experienced, the memories will persist in going from the present back in time personally and, in those instances, the memory is desirable to have from the standpoint of the extraterrestrial overseers. They want the recruits to fear them and to remember the severity of what they were subjected to because that will keep them in line, keep them disciplined, and will reinforce the training—at least this is their belief. They are unconcerned about the trauma it causes and the mental stability of the recruits. They are simply expected to obey, tolerate discipline, and do what the extraterrestrials command.