If doing a Lightworker Healing Protocol session for a group of known clients while also specifying all of humanity to be included results in a compromise, can the high priority client group be requested to be worked on first, followed by a request to have the rest of humanity worked on in like fashion, in order to ensure their clients get high priority, but still do both groups with a single Protocol session? Will that preserve a potential advantage for clients a practitioner has obligations to, but still put the session work to broader use for the human population?

This is truly not necessary. If one is requesting a session for the entirety of humanity, you can be sure a new group of clients requesting help from a practitioner will receive the full treatment they deserve. However, you can construct the session in that fashion, and by listing the primary clients who may be of interest or paying for the services, they will, in actuality, be worked on first to construct the first sub-group. This is because the practitioner is originating the request and the way energies work, the healing will proceed from that starting point and spread outward. So by being in the conscious awareness of the practitioner, they will naturally be the starting point for the exercise. So what you are asking about is not necessary, but will in fact occur. It is just that it will not be of practical significance to go first when all of humanity can be done in a single session quite readily by divine realm, and then the repeat sessions continued from there for all. So there is nothing wrong with listing clients by name. In a sense, this is a nice touch because it formalizes the commitment of the practitioner to the clients in question and gives them their due by naming them before the divine realm as of particular interest, and this will have some additional ability to tie the karmic energies together to make those bonds a bit stronger. It is also the case that the practitioner, by honoring the client by name inclusion is, in this fashion, fulfilling an obligation to service the client directly, rather than promise a session done for them when, in fact, they will simply be in a sea of other target humans done as an aggregate. As we have explained a number of times, in actuality, this makes no difference because the divine realm holds everyone close and believes all are special, and will not favor one over another, even though humans may choose to do so for the people they know. We simply do not operate in that fashion, but will follow the human lead when necessary, although this we see of little importance and is simply a human perspective. The way you are setting up your Protocol, to have every session applied to the entirety of humanity in this fashion is truly highest and best because it wastes nothing, it hurts no one, because there is no practical trade-off for doing a small number of individuals or single person in a session. The opposite is the case, that we see it as unfortunate to have any missed opportunity to restrict a human intention to help, applied to a very few when that same intention could be applied to the entirety of the human race for the betterment of all.