Humanity appears to suffer from an extreme case of “short-sightedness.” Obviously, this can be partially explained by our relatively short lifespans. But even within the life of a single person, it’s unusual to expect anything outside of a house to last for more than a decade. And many things don’t last even that long. This is like an “artificial hardship” that is imposed and self-imposed. Many refrigerators built in the 1950s still work like new today, while today’s high-end models need expensive servicing, often just months after purchase. It’s as if our lives are intentionally designed to break, and break often, and expensively. We know planned obsolescence is real, but this is getting extreme now. It appears we do it to ourselves. Is this appearance deceiving? What is Creator’s perspective?

We can tell you with authority that the growing and almost universally adopted strategy of planned obsolescence has been orchestrated by the Extraterrestrial Alliance to undermine the world, reduce efficiency, increase cost burdens, and hinder your progress. This is all done by mind control. It is easy to convince corporate overseers to engineer their products to be just so long-lived so they will need to be replaced at intervals. This is hugely wasteful, inefficient, and a drain on productivity. The fact it is being done deliberately to cause harm is a reflection of the evil of the interlopers running things. It is not the human leaders acting solely through the corrupting influences of greed and self‑interest, finding clever ways to make more profit for themselves. It is an actual manipulation to change the inner beliefs and thinking of the people doing the planning to corrupt them, make them short-sighted, and blind to their contribution to this overall lessening of the quality of life and human progress as a whole, because so much time and energy gets consumed by running in place, in effect, because things only last so long and then break down and require expensive replacements. You see as well in this, a large component of complacency being necessary for such a scheme to be tolerated. So the key to this having the desired negative impact is not to keep it hidden and unnoticed, which is actually impossible because to lose something like an appliance creates an immediate inconvenience and impact on things and almost forces spending what it takes to replace something essential for modern living. But what is engendered within the minds of people is a general complacency to accept a lower standard for the functioning and reliability of consumer goods and products. There is no hue and cry demanding quality and a long useful life. This is a kind of cheapening that is reinforced through mind control to emphasize the relentless pursuit of the cheapest version of something, and to believe that will suffice, at least until proven otherwise. So people are manipulated into becoming almost robot-like and not thinking strategically about the cost outlay versus the useful life of things. Indeed, in this environment, the manufacturer with the better product will almost always suffer, and be hindered in successful competition with the ready availability of much cheaper alternatives, and they may be driven out of business entirely. In prior eras, many people would appreciate the value of longevity and the higher quality that adds substance to performance, and would simply save money until they had enough to buy something that would last in preference to something shoddy that might help them get by but ultimately would wear out, too, and work less well in the bargain. Those perspectives have been overridden by mind control programming in the majority of consumers.