He asks: “Is Creator still insisting that the vaccines have and will continue to prevent more deaths and devastating health impacts than they are responsible for?”

Now that this phenomenon has been introduced, the downside introduced by the extraterrestrial contaminants is a much more serious concern. At the outset, all batches of the vaccine contained marker nanochips that were not a danger to health, only a tracking technology to enable the extraterrestrials to locate people even in hiding. That was an adjunct to assist the coming annihilation, at which point it makes little difference whether you are tagged or not. They will find you, or you will be among the last few stragglers left with nothing to live for and very likely no way to survive for very long. So to now be adding something that causes the formation of a kind of technological parasite that can block blood flow in vessels is a clear threat to health and function and indeed is fatal in some recipients. That is a game changer for the worst. We have not favored use of the vaccine in young healthy people and that has been the scientific perspective of many experts from the very outset of the pandemic. The true greatest need is among older people and those with compromised immunity, so the widespread and universal administration in all ages as mandates was truly going against sound scientific principles, historically followed, to proceed cautiously unless there are dire threats to survival from a new organism. So there was an extreme overreaction by governments because of extraterrestrial mind control that have now put people increasingly at risk in creating this mindset, that ongoing vaccinations and boosters may be needed on a regular basis. We have even warned about the possibility of contamination with morgellons by the ETs. This is in the same category of organism-like technology that is deceptively configured, in this case simply the presence of “clots” in vessels, but on closer inspection these are seen to be something strange. This certainly changes the risk-benefit ratio, particularly with the possibility of fatal outcomes.