Taken alone, the idea of protection against Covid and new strains arising does not change the desirability of having a vaccine for those most susceptible, especially the elderly. It certainly becomes more complicated given that this is a biowarfare campaign and new strains may be generated at regular intervals to compound the difficulty and create situations like this, where the prior approaches for improving safety become less effective and might even be disadvantageous on a percentage basis. That is what is developing here, not to mention the fact that increasing batches of such vaccines are doctored with harmful viruses causing autoimmune disease and cancer, and other maladies as well. We have never been a proponent of vaccinating the young.
So this is no different than any kind of medical intervention. Everything that is invasive has a downside, so it is important to look at the individual patient, their health status, and the risks they face given their age and history. The karmic predispositions will not be known, so one size does not fit all, looking at a single parameter such as the age. Some children are killed by Covid, although not many. So there are always exceptions to any rule. People risk the downside of medical treatments all the time. The idea that one should never get a vaccine because a certain percentage might have an adverse effect of some sort is no different than the question of taking a prescription drug that has a certain incidence of side effects. In most cases, people will follow their doctor's suggestions and not demand perfection. When the latter happens, it is almost always a consequence of a disinformation campaign to discourage a particular medical intervention and its use because it serves the interlopers more than the human population when people refuse medical treatment.
Please login or Register to submit your answer