This is the case. It is only that you have not focused on this and tracked individuals and gotten the scrupulous data concerning outcomes that you have not seen this yet. It is not because it has not happened, is because of the fact you are asking for such a thing to happen and would not expect it and often will not share with you either that this is one of their issues. As you can appreciate, it is a matter of some personal embarrassment, and not expecting something can be done, they will not even bring it up—even in the context of discussing a personal healing. Most people, when there is a clear and well-established mechanism for their disorder from the scientific realm, will not seek an alternative healer. It is more likely to happen for the vague things, not things that seem cut and dried and carved in stone—things like cancer or a viral infection for example, seemingly being a situation where there is a kind of malevolent force going on that is extremely difficult to control. ‘If science cannot do it’ is the thinking, it is really, really hard and a tough challenge and therefore unlikely to be cured successfully through a simple divine outreach. This, of course, is ill-considered an even illogical, but there is some truth that when the belief is minimal in the possibility of restoration, it does become less likely because the belief quotient will be lower. This can be compensated for through the practitioner having a sufficient belief quotient to achieve the desired result—but there is no guarantee here of a sufficient quotient being present in some cases.
Please login or Register to submit your answer