Nicola Staff asked 2 years ago
This is an insightful question and a greater danger than simply some risk-taking about dwelling on or amplifying particular circumstances of concern to the client, which the compassion keys might accentuate. Presenting leading language describing suffering may be intuitively accurate in a general sense that applies to the work at hand, but there are only so many emotions that are within the range of human expression that will cover literally many, many, thousands of bad times and traumas of all kinds. So to get someone focused on an issue like sadness, or feeling unloved, invites an inner search for matching events to check on. This, the deep subconscious can do quite thoroughly and effectively and will see an endless series of dramas it has lived through giving rise to those feelings being offered compassion by the facilitator. The danger is, indeed, in stirring up old karmic business that comes to light in surveying the landscape. And while the work itself might be focused on a current life issue recalled by the upper subconscious, and perhaps the conscious mind as well, the deep subconscious will have a parallel tour and be left with a pile of unhealed traumas to contend with on its own. And that might well worsen the client by leaving many things buzzing but unhealed, which might never have come up but for a would-be healer encouraging them to enter the mine-field, so to speak, at the risk they will set off an explosion and compound the client's difficulty. So this is a trade-off to be considered in use of this approach. We think the Lightworker Healing Protocol is a superior tool because it deals with all of the old karmic entanglements, but once removed from the agony of the deep subconscious, and so does not invite or create a worsening of things by, in effect, rubbing the nose of the client in it along the way.
Please login or Register to submit your answer
