Nicola Staff asked 2 years ago
You are questioning the wisdom of your own question here as you do the channeling, but we can tell you that you thought about this for a reason, and that is specifically to probe deeper into the mechanisms of non-local consciousness in this way. In a sense, non-local consciousness is like a carrier wave that conveys frequency, having a meaning, and could be in the form of a message. That is a crude analogy still, compared to the elegance of the energetics of consciousness, that are beyond human understanding, but as a general way of understanding what takes place, you are spot-on in seeing this as an information exchange and not some kind of intrusion or bombardment on the repository itself, that might require the launching of energies to provide an answer that could reach back to the originator of the inquiry, and might be in the form of a reprisal or have some other energetic consequence, perhaps linking the inquirer with the originator of consciousness on file, and thus creating karmic entanglements that are unwanted and perhaps hazardous—that will not happen.
You saw intuitively that the repositories of consciousness, whether the akashic records or the collective unconscious, generated by whatever species, is akin to a read-only library where you can enter, look something up, study it, and take away knowledge in a fashion that does not change the library itself. Just as with a physical library, you do not use it up by interacting, you are simply entering as an observer of what is on record, on file, and that remains unchanged by your visit, and so will continue to exist and can be referenced later by others, and in fact will be protected from any intrusion or alteration by the divine so no one can change history, at least in that fashion.
Please login or Register to submit your answer
