This is very true and would be a valuable cleanup to request and see to. We agree with your channel, that there is no harm in prioritizing the coronavirus for high-level attention at this point. We know there will be additional viruses addressed by the Protocol when you have finished your survey of the interplay of viral infection with various chronic diseases and want to target a select set of viruses in particular for high-level attention. Those viruses directly affecting human survival need to be a high priority. The others are a cause of great suffering and many individual tragedies but do not endanger survival of humanity. And then beyond the human subjects there are many viruses within nature now that are a scourge and a hindrance to life forms that influence humanity indirectly. So this would be a useful undertaking in particular circumstances where extra priority is desired, but the Protocol already includes all harmful organisms to be dealt with and their influences on all possible targets, so this is inherently redundant. This is why singling out something like the coronavirus issue because of its high impact and potential catastrophic nature adds extra urgency to the situation and is worthy of devoting special attention to mention it specifically to highlight the problem.
Please login or Register to submit your answer