A viewer asks: “Source Creator, if I have got this right, you are in general recommending the vaccines against the SARS-CoV-2 virus. But you also warn against the nanochip in the vaccines. Could you please explain the logic in this?”

This is entirely logical. We have explained that the nanochip is of minimal risk, in practical terms, for human beings. Even though it is entirely sinister and present for a dreadful purpose, it is passive. It will not be causing harm from being present within a person. It is only a useful adjunct to extraterrestrials scanning a location to find out where humans might be hiding. That will only be implemented and of value to them in the event of a full-scale annihilation of humanity, at which point you are better off being taken out early rather than to become a holdout and becoming a hunted animal with no quality of life possible. If things were to reach that stage, life would not be worth living. There would be no infrastructure, there would be no food, you might not have access to water, depending on your location, so you will likely not live very long and even if somehow you were able to remain hidden long enough to not be captured, the world would be empty and desolate and you would not be likely to survive very long under those circumstances with any kind of enjoyment or satisfaction. It would be a devastating and soul-deadening experience to go through and would only add further karmic wounding to the insult of having your world taken from you, in effect, from the demise of your culture and the human community. Even with that, we can tell you that the nanochip can be neutralized, and this is done by the work of the Lightworker Healing Protocol, so it is only a risk to those not subject to healing done by the LHP over time. There are some who resist all divine assistance and may well not be benefitted in that way but, as we said, it is not really a benefit to humans to have that removed or neutralized in the way you might think. It is of benefit to the interlopers to make their extermination a little easier and more rapid; it is not a deciding factor in continuation of the species or even for individual survival, given that it is not the only way they will be searching for people who are holdouts. On the plus side, the vaccine saves many lives. To forego that potential benefit for the sake of avoiding the nanochip is truly human folly, given that the nanochip is not really a meaningful risk to you. Whereas the virus can be deadly if there are predisposing health conditions, or even a karmic predisposition that is silent but is reawakened with the onset of illness and the person finds themselves in a fight for life undergoing hospitalization and more and more severe interventions to keep them going, at least in a minority of cases, most of which are preventable by vaccination. We have gone on record to state that even with side effects, including some who might die as a consequence of the vaccine injecting them with the spike protein of the virus, if they are ultrasensitive, those are the very people who will likely have a terrible course with a frank illness from the virus, and are the very ones who would end up hospitalized and even dying despite having been vaccinated if their system is so very sensitive to the negative effects of the spike protein. So the vaccine is just a small exposure to what the person is subjected to from a large-scale viral replication that accompanies illness, and need not be feared more than infection with the virus itself—it is truly the lesser of evils here—so these basic descriptions you cite are not at all conflicting or contradictory.