A viewer asks: “So traditionally, if a community large or small removed or lost its municipal police department (due to bankruptcy), the Sheriff would take over. But Sheriffs have to get operating funds from SOMEWHERE, and I doubt the City Council that just fired their own police are going to vote any dollars to the Sheriff (as there may not be any to vote over!), who is usually a thorn in their side in most cases anyway, with little love lost. The FEDS on the other hand have UNLIMITED funds as they are tied into the Federal Reserve who can simply print money. Plus local politicians have been DEEPLY corrupted by Federal handout dollars and even privatization. We know the Globalists, the “Cabal” has wanted a national police force and the elimination of local police FOR A LONG TIME. Looks like they are moving forward with their plan. Something has to fill the void, and I’m guessing it will likely end up being the “Department of Homeland Security” POLICE which I fear will quickly become our “Stasi” or “Gestapo” or NKVD. Am I right? And was this the plan for a while? Some speculate contractors might be used. If so, WHO would they ultimately answer to? And who would pay for them?”

You are looking into the future here, but the future meets up with the present and is truly on display in the recent events you cite as perhaps the beginning of trend. This could well happen with a widespread economic collapse that makes support of local government untenable, due to bankruptcy coupled with social unrest issues making people respond favorably to programming with an agenda to shut down local police departments altogether. None of this is natural. It is a manipulation intending to worsen things to make communities helpless in the face of chaos and widespread crime that will certainly be ginned up to crisis proportions if a vacuum in police presence is engineered successfully. The problem of running out of money by local municipalities is quite real. State budgets as well will be similarly constrained. The plan is to have a national police force at the ready, much like the National Guard used at times to keep order when local law enforcement is underpowered. In its absence, a federal police unit could be put into place and then funded through federal coffers ostensibly to solve the problem of the impoverishment in the community. The trade-off will be individuals of uncertain background and a much greater susceptibility to inner programming to make them minions of the deep state more than sympathetic fellow citizens willing to do a tough and often thankless job, but wanting to help the community and help individual people as well. In times of difficulty or crisis, the majority of police officers normally are much like social workers and provide the only higher-level support most individuals get that will ever be available to them, particularly in poor areas. They are quite effective in helping people with advice, steadying things, providing needed structure and discipline, and also act as sources of information for people to get government services when there is a need for food and health care, for example. The federal police will be more inclined to be focused on actual crime and its management than people’s problems and points of friction, so it will be a much less effective solution than the current police departments represent. So it is a step down a darker path and not the best answer for dealing with police officers who are corrupted in some way. That problem will not go away by simply bringing in a different group of individuals hired at the federal level.