A viewer asks: “Is the following wording change of benefit to the Protocol: Instead of “Source Creator, charge any interfering energy vortex with positive energy so it will only benefit the beings at client locations,” update this as “Source Creator, charge or change any interfering energy vortex at the client location to the energy needed to benefit the entire Earth and its inhabitants?”

This is nonsensical because the problem with an energy vortex that is emanating negative energies is the damage it does to beings in the living. To create a positive emanation of energy that would benefit those beings might have little effect on Gaia as a whole, but to increase the energy such that it would benefit the entire planet might be undesirable in terms of effects locally on humans or other beings. So this is not possible to reconcile, to have something optimal for the planet necessarily and serve humans well or vice versa. As the planet is for human habitation, there is nothing wrong with optimizing conditions to benefit human survival and a thriving of human culture. Nothing that supports humans will be harmful to Gaia but vastly increased energy that might be taken in stride by the planet, or even of benefit to the planet, might be overwhelming to individual human beings in the same way that the planet takes the countless lightning strikes occurring each day in stride, but when humans walk into one it can be fatal.