This paradigm is accurate as far as it goes with the exception that the terminology yet invokes a kind of distortion because it is couched in terms of particles and, therefore, granularity is not a useful characteristic as a part of the description so much as vibration would be concerned. So we would suggest speaking in terms of vibration rather than granularity and degree of fineness. There is a desire here to break away from prior characterizations and there are reasons for this that are fully understandable, but it is important to move forward and not move in a retrograde fashion to return to older ways of thinking when they themselves fall short and provide inaccurate descriptions and only add further confusion.
Please login or Register to submit your answer