DWQA QuestionsCategory: Channeling PitfallsA viewer asks: “Could you ask Creator for a verification that my dowsing has been consistently accurately accessing divine guidance, since I started using it after Creator confirmed accuracy through you? I’m especially wondering about the past month. I’ve been getting some surprising answers that has made me want to make sure the dowsing itself is accurate.” What can we tell him?
Nicola Staff asked 3 months ago
We have said previously that dowsing has pitfalls and the major issue is a lack of perfection in being restricted to something that is a yes or no readout when the truth might fall in between in an important respect. And thus, to answer "yes" might over-represent the value or importance of something, so it is better to say "no" to prevent an exaggerated assumption taking hold that might have long-term consequences through working from false assumptions. What we're saying is that dowsing is a crude instrument. It is bad enough to have a high-level channeling and work with language alone as the means of exchanging information. We consider that quite crude, but it is far better than dowsing. So, to be precise, we want to frame the discussion here with the awareness that obtaining a perfect track record with dowsing is extremely unlikely, especially when you are wanting to do a high-level project and much of the information and knowledge is unknown to you to begin with. The imprecision of working with a binary readout is coupled with the difficulty that, many times, you were asking things that require us to lead with new knowledge and information. That is extremely difficult to do through dowsing alone because, again, saying yes or no to something might be construed as taking the answer further than we can allow. So we might say no to something to prevent overstepping the boundaries in the rules of engagement. A good rule of thumb for dowsing is that for most individuals the accuracy will be in the 80% range. The best you can do is take extra time and effort to probe critical questions from different perspectives in order to get across-validation. If you think about the meaning of what you are wanting to find out and its importance and break that into component parts that represent the whole but are not requiring as large a leap of ignorance, that is a more reliable way to put together a mosaic containing the answer you wish to arrive at, because more of the pieces will have been put in place along the way by going slow and being thorough. The trap here is that once you get an answer to your liking, it will likely lead to inner belief being formed as to whether it is true or false and that begins the buildup of an inner bias that inevitably leads in a certain direction that makes the enterprise inherently uncertain and dangerous in the sense of taking on a life of its own to direct you down a false path. So again, we are simply wanting to round out the picture about the use of dowsing and its pitfalls, not suggesting you stand down and throw away the tool, but know that you must live with lack of perfection.