A student suggests adding to the Lightworker Healing Protocol the following: “Source Creator, please mitigate all weather patterns and earth changes engineered to harm humanity and Gaia, and restore a state of equilibrium as rapidly as possible.” Will that be an enhancement?

Technically speaking, this will not be an enhancement because it is currently a part of the Protocol. This is within the wide scope of difficulties experienced by Gaia and, in particular, those things involving the environment of the planet and its energetics, although humanity and its issues are part of Gaia as well. One could simply do a Protocol session for all of Gaia and it would include all the human and nonhuman clients as well, because all are present within Gaia or have links to Gaia. But some specificity is good, and that is why many categories of client recipients are spelled out. The particular issues they may have are tremendously varied and cannot all be listed as this would be an exhaustive process and would still leave some things out in all likelihood. So this is why there is a middle-of-the-road approach currently, to include the classes of recipients and their origins, and then various categories of issues taken up in turn, to be applied to the entire cohort of clients, including Gaia herself and all of the interdependent aspects energetically. You could spell this out and that would be beneficial if someone does not believe weather-related problems are being addressed by the Protocol, as is the case here. The penalty for adding more and more and more levels of specificity is to have the Protocol not only become unwieldy, but to take things to a point where it is become such a lengthy list, the divine realm will begin to interpret it as intended to be all-inclusive and will do only those things mentioned specifically. This is something that is highly undesirable. It would be far better to drive home the point in the heads of every practitioner that what are mentioned are categories of recipients and issues, and are intended to be comprehensive and all-inclusive. Whether every possible difficulty is stated or not, there is an attempt to reach a reasonable balance of including many of the larger issues with descriptions, but not intending a restriction of the Protocol to only those specific things mentioned, but rather all types of difficulty from whatever source.