Nicola Staff asked 6 years ago
This is a fine idea but needs to be configured differently. As we have explained before, any prayer request that is general that is directed at a large group of targets must be dispensed equally as we cannot play favorites. As a consequence, we cannot choose a target for anyone even though they may wish fervently to be of service and benefit to one in need, especially one particularly needy. We cannot make those choices, so our hands are tied. We can dispense the love, but it will, in fact, be spread out among many, many, souls and as a consequence, it is unlikely actual rescues will ensue. There will be some benefit, some raising of vibration, and perhaps a lessening of torment to some degree for those truly being menaced by attackers in the lower astral plane, but the primary objective of the client will not be achieved.
This forces each practitioner to have a clarity and focus of attention to take responsibility for the entire enterprise, to not only specify all of the benefits to be included and how the divine realm is to go about doing the work, at least in a general sense as outlined by the Lightworker Healing Protocol wording, but also to choose the intended target. We understand this may leave uncertainty, especially when practitioners are not adept intuitively and feel they can trust feedback about whether particular potential targets are in the light or not. This is unfortunate and will seem frustrating for them, but as in all human undertaking, the race goes to the swift. The skillful will accomplish more than the novice and the talented will outshine the average person. This is the way of the world. Not all are on equal levels of knowledge, understanding, and accomplishment.
We suggest people launch in and do the best they can, and if they work systematically to include one or two targets if they are in doubt, they will most likely do just fine and at least one will be rescued. And as you are contemplating this and thinking about the ratio of one in three needing help, this would be fine also, to make it one in three by including three names with each request when there is a lack of confidence in getting intuitive feedback about the status of the potential targets as to whether they are in the light or not. In this way, one of the group will most likely be in need and perhaps all, but whether it is one, two, or three, all will be receiving help. The same strategy can be applied to any of the Protocol types, whether it is a person, location, lost soul spirit, or an animal.
We also do not wish to see people reinforce setting limits on themselves by assuming their reach is marginal and then feeling not empowered sufficiently to the task. This is a prescription for achieving poor results because they themselves are setting limits that the divine realm must follow. With such a preamble, we must look even more closely at the level of doubt they hold within and limit the benefit from the work accordingly. It is far better to assume the reach is fully adequate for a group of three targets and even if this is not the case in actuality, some benefits will happen. This is the price of being human and having to grow into new roles at times where much practice must take place before becoming fully competent and actual performance reaches a level of effectiveness to be rewarding. There are many ways to deal with this need for practice and experience, one of which would be to target strangers, perhaps individuals in the news one has no direct involvement with or particular stake in the outcome, as would be the case working on a close friend or family member. That will take much pressure off the new practitioner and will allow the experience to grow and confidence to build inwardly so there will be no awkwardness. And through repetition, thoughts will not come up questioning how they are doing and perhaps introduce a restriction in the divine delivery.
Please login or Register to submit your answer
