A student asks: “Will asking to have effects of “toxins” removed during the Soul Matrix Healing include heavy metal removal, or would it be better to specify that in addition?” Is there a better, general, all-encompassing, term we could use, like “all toxic substances?”

This is more complicated than people realize, as you are even thinking further about it and mounting the question during this channeling that there are many toxic substances that are essential for life as they are biologically required to be present at certain concentrations but may be lethal at higher levels, so it is a relative term. The term toxic or toxin is always relative to the innate characteristics and where they are acting, as to whether there is a useful role or not. We understand your student is pointing out through a strict dictionary definition as he understands the term “toxin,” he feels heavy metals would not be removed. That, of course, by creating the intention, means the divine realm cannot take care of this. You, on the other hand, have used the term to represent all toxic substances, so your compromise to state that explicitly, avoids use of the more narrow term “toxin” as it is often taken to being a biologic material, and so the inorganic substances might seem to be uncovered.

So rather than have to explain why we are using a term that can be misconstrued, it would be advantageous to just sidestep this and make clear explicitly, the intention is to remove all toxic substances and that will be interpreted by divine realm to not totally remove things like iron, for example, that might be a metallic contaminant of dangerous consequences at a high intake level but nonetheless is essential to life. The divine realm will understand that it is things posing a danger, so you could even say toxic substances posing a danger to the person so that those things that have a range of useful concentrations necessary for life would not be disturbed simply because they are inherently capable of toxicity. That is true, of course, of all prescription drugs because they all have levels that become toxic, and many people would not want their pharmaceuticals negated.

So using this broad term is the best approach here, as you have counseled your student that once you start making a list of specific items, there is no end because every chemical substance created by human chemists as well as the millions of chemicals found in nature that are present in many plants and in other materials that may be ingested or absorbed topically all come into play potentially, regarding health outcomes and must be factored in. So here, a broad term is warranted and if simply defined as any toxic substance that poses a danger, you are covering all the bases. All of the Protocol steps, by and large, are general categories and are not specific as to many variations, subtle subtypes, and variants. That would be impossible because of your state of ignorance. But by including the categories, you are on safe ground because the divine realm can use that as a sufficient launching pad to take care of the whole spectrum of possibilities. The same is true here.