A student asks: “At the end of Lightworker Healing Protocol it says to erase the energetic trail to myself, and we thought it was a good idea to add the client to that statement as some of the healing may come from the client.” Is that good idea or not necessary for most users of the Protocol?

This is not strictly required. If you are enlisting the consciousness of the client and envisioning there could be a liability, then it would be important to specify this, but this will not generally be done by practitioners of the Lightworker Healing Protocol. This again illustrates that each and every time you depart from the way the Protocol is worded and the basic intentions as described in the user manual, you open yourself, and the client as well, to uncertainties taking place that might undermine the effectiveness of the Protocol as much as they add something that is not anticipated. If you are asking the client to participate in the healing, then the creation of an aspect of the client to be a practitioner can potentially create visibility for them. If you view this as a potential liability in that thought, your intention has created a liability for them that now the divine realm must allow to persist. And so, you have undermined your client with those thoughts. Keep in mind that the Protocol, in multiple places, asks for ongoing support, healing, and protection. So the client is given every benefit of divine grace that you can summon from multiple standpoints to have the safety ongoing and throughout all time domains, and to have the spirit team on watch to block any attempt to intrude or interfere with the client in any fashion, and if it happens, to have the spirit team step in and remove anything that does get through. This is all requested for the client, not for the practitioner. You are asking the Protocol to be done on you, so when you have your personal session, all of those requests will be applied to you. But while you are working on the client as practitioner, there is no other statement of broad protection other than at the outset. What happens subsequently when you stand down is what this request is designed to address. In other words, that there could be an energetic trace that could be followed still remaining because you have gone out and interacted with the client to do the work. And so this request to separate you from this history is designed to preserve your anonymity and erase any trace of your former presence during the work. So this is designed to take care of that potential liability. There will clearly be evidence the client has been worked on with healing, because they will be different, their energy will be different, their karmic history will be different. So if this is noticed by the interlopers, it won't matter if the client went out and asked the divine realm to assist them. That will not get them into trouble, so there is nothing truly to trace back. The protection for the practitioner is from the response of the interlopers to seeing the client has been altered and then wanting to find out by whom and trace any links to whoever may have interfered with their property. The divine realm will always tidy up after itself, so any outreach by the client to the divine will be taken care of. If the client reaches out to the practitioner, that will be seen as part of the work and the divine realm will tidy that up. So you can ask for this in addition if you choose, and it never hurts to cover all the bases, especially when you are modifying the Protocol in ways you wish to implement it.