A student asks: Are the studies and conclusions largely correct in the book by Jim West: 50 human studies, in utero, conducted in modern China, indicate extreme risk for prenatal ultrasound: a new biography?

This is indeed the case, and it is a good example of selective attention and oversight by the Extraterrestrial Alliance discouraging rigorous scientific inquiry of potential safety issues for this technology that has been the case since its inception. And this was deliberate, to use mind control to cause a state of complacency and redirect thinking away from the possibility of this being harmful and to not, in fact, highlight this as an unanswered question, especially considering the history of x-rays which, after all, are completely unfelt by the person, even in massive doses, but yet can have devastating long-term consequences. Because with ultrasound this is an energy within the electromagnetic frequency spectrum for which there is long-standing assumptions of general safety, it is a falling back on conventional wisdom by not looking more deeply, rather than a rigorous analysis. This assumption is a house of cards, that once one type of energy is put in the environment and nothing seems to happen as a direct consequence, others can be produced, and the assumption becomes conventional wisdom that such energies are benign when, in fact, none have been truly studied in a rigorous way because of the difficulties in not being able to do experiments on human beings for ethical reasons. So, on the one hand, there is a plausible explanation for how this situation can come about, but we can tell you there are enough worriers among the scientific community that this would receive careful attention, and more support financially to do studies if it were taken seriously, given the very large number of in vitro studies showing deleterious effects on cells and in animals. The illogic of the conclusions reached make apparent that mind control manipulation is at work when those very studies showing harm are simply dismissed out of hand because they do not involve human tissue, but yet on the other side of the coin, animal models are used all the time to justify using pharmaceuticals in humans if they show a beneficial effect. And conversely, when potential new drug agents come along, they are first tested on animals to determine safety as best one can using animals as a surrogate before any use is made, even a single dose trial in human beings, so this leap of faith in the safety of diagnostic ultrasound is a glaring inconsistency and breach of logic. The Chinese studies are largely correct in their overall interpretation here that there are certainly damaging effects on fetal cells and tissues from ultrasound energies typically encountered in routine use of ultrasound imaging of pregnant women, so fetal tissue will be harmed, and this is a serious issue indeed.