A practitioner asks: “Is the “Great Barrington Declaration” the most divinely aligned and least harmful pandemic response plan? Would this have been implemented globally if interlopers had not manipulated most countries into lockdown and mandate policies?”

It is not perfect, from a divine perspective, but it is as good as human reason and intellect could devise and, in the absence of more definitive scientific information about some of the fine details, would be workable and would indeed have been a global approach almost exactly, and universally planetwide, without the manipulation by the interlopers to confound thinking and manipulate human leaders to employ more draconian and punitive measures under the guise of their being "reasoned public health measures." It is on record and documented, over many years now, what the best public health response to pandemics should look like, and lockdowns were simply never contemplated to be used, except under the most extreme of circumstances with a very high lethality pathogen. Despite some inflation of the casualty numbers early on, there was never an indication that COVID-19 was in that category of being "highly lethal," so the lockdown and mandate policies were never in alignment with historical public health policy, but are something new to the occasion brought to you courtesy of the interlopers.