There are two basic problems with this simple premise. The first is that hypnosis will reach all of the subconscious. This, in fact, does not happen. Your channel has been careful to clarify this point and, in fact, will be credited in the future with the discovery of the deep subconscious that is beneath the reach of even the deepest hypnotic trance techniques. That disconnect is the source of the major difficulty people have with their emotional life and the major stumbling block in dealing with the energies of karma being unearthed and experienced by the deep subconscious in its review of the akashic records but then is unable to share the information with the conscious self to have it weigh in and perhaps give reassurance. So using hypnosis will not allow you to talk with the deep subconscious to address its issues and get any real idea of what it is struggling with currently. It cannot tell you—it is that simple. So the tool of hypnosis is not up to the task of reaching the most important part of the subconscious.
The second problem with your thesis is in assuming that this can be healed with suggestion. Using hypnotic suggestions is the weakest form of manipulation that can be applied in helping someone. While the fact it is delivered by a hypnotist during a trance state will allow it to be considered and perhaps embraced by a portion of the mind that can be demonstrated to act on the suggestion, as in the case of what hypnotists do to illustrate the effectiveness of post-hypnotic suggestions, to induce some behavior following the emergence from the trance state simply because it was suggested earlier for the person to act on the suggestion in a certain way. Those are trivial exercises and do not come close to the question of whether someone can be persuaded to change their beliefs or act in a different fashion than governed by their own inner beliefs simply because it is suggested by a hypnotist during trance that this will be so from now on. The person might have a conscious recollection at an appropriate time that this is a good idea, but it will be unlikely to be embraced naturally and effectively during the course of the life. So we see this to be a weak approach that will fall well short of what is needed to make a fundamental difference for people with serious issues and problems in their life.
Please login or Register to submit your answer