A practitioner asks: “From my understanding of Karl’s channeling from Creator, illnesses such as cancer take many sessions to heal, and when asking for healing we must specifically state what we want healed. Since the LHP covers healing of all aspects of a person’s life, I have just been listing my family members’ names when doing an LHP and asking that all mental and/or physical problems be healed for them. I also include these same family members every time I do an LHP. In the protocol, each person’s higher self and God determines what needs to be healed. Have I been doing the LHPs wrong by not listing specific items for each family member that I think needs healing?” What can we tell her?

It is not that you are wrong, it is simply that you are not getting the most out of your sessions relying solely on the divine realm to set the agenda. You are confusing the wording of the protocol and its intentions a bit in terms of the possibilities here for adding greater specificity where it might count the most. So, first of all, the higher self and God do not decide what gets healed solely on their own. If left to do so, that will be the default. The fact that the protocols specifically request both higher self and God to use their detective ability to see what is most vital, what is most important and crucial to work on, is a fine idea and will help in many, many situations where there may be no visible problems at the moment, but there might be a huge karmic problem looming that could be worked on prior to the onset of symptoms through those requests. But when there are known issues, there is nothing to stop you from asking for help directly to give those a high priority. Your channel has encouraged this on the part of practitioners and described how he does this when he does his session work, that at the point of the protocol asking for the name or list of names of the client, he will stop, refer to his wish list, and review those in greatest need by name and issue. While not strictly necessary, that adds some extra intention and will certainly create the priority for those listed and their issues to be given first priority. That is your right to do as a human, to set your personal agenda in how you want things to happen, and we always do our best to follow your lead. When you do not lead, you will take what you get. Your channel has discussed at times the fact we may have a different view of priorities. We might regard something non-life-threatening but highly disturbing as a lower priority because we see something in the future that could reduce the lifespan, but work needs to be started in earnest to prevent that from happening, and so the majority of energy might be devoted to that larger life-threatening issue but leaving a person without relief for issues they are aware of personally that matter greatly to them. There are always judgment calls in making decisions about the order of battle, the amount of attention that can be devoted in what ways, for how long, and in what sequence. The main problem is not ever having enough fuel to do it all. The more additional requests you make in the conduct of your sessions, the more intention you will be injecting into the partnership, and that will provide some additional fuel. So your loving concern, and earnestness in pausing for a moment as you line up your top priority recipients for a healing session, can add more benefit than you might think in terms of the energy, even if you are only thinking of their name and what they suffer as highest priority, whether one or multiple issues. So we would encourage you to adopt that practice; it will make the session come alive rather than just have an abstract session without names and faces in what you are focused on.