Would it be valuable to include specifying that the entire rest of the free will galaxy and all within it be healed, among the group of existing types of clients in the Lightworker Healing Protocol? In addition to reaching, potentially, many other victims like humanity, this would widen the purview to net many additional spirit meddlers attached to other beings and speed the day when they have all been sent to the light for cleansing and rehabilitation. Are there other potential advantages?

This is another fine idea for the reasons you have stated. You are aware of the considerations here but there is an interpenetration of the energies. There are not arbitrary walls separating your solar system from the rest of the galaxy. So the many energies of consciousness and spirits out and about can freely come and go across the galaxy and there will be an influx of new spirit meddlers from distant areas to the extent they are removed from the proximity to the living human community by your efforts. There is a relentless and growing desperation to have sources of energy as so many soul beings are taken, and there will often be a wide-ranging search for fresh blood, so to speak, so humans will continue to be at risk as long as these spirits abound within your galaxy as a whole. There are many lost soul spirits of extraterrestrials as well as humans that stray beyond the solar system environs. To fully heal these communities of beings needs a very broad outreach for their rescue.

This is technically allowed with the current Protocol, but this broadening to make it all‑encompassing will add greater latitude and prioritization for the broadest possible purview with the rescue efforts. In a sense, it encompasses everything else spelled out by the Protocol, but it would still be advantageous to have the individual classes of target clients stated explicitly for greatest possible clarity, so the human intention of the practitioners will be in alignment with the best intentions of the Protocol, and things will not get overlooked because the person has not been fully educated about the potential reach of the Protocol, so including this as an extra category will only add and not take away.

A viewer asks: “Is the healing process called “Spiritual Response Therapy” both effective and of value to learn?” How does it compare to Holographic Memory Resolution and DNA ThetaHealing, or the Lightworker Healing Protocol?

This is a somewhat effective process because it helps bring people into an alignment with inner torment from what is going on in the subconscious and to set an intention for it to be resolved and something better substituted. So it approaches the type of healing that is most desirable, but it is not as elegant and focused and precise and effective as HMR or DNA ThetaHealing, being that it goes about its work in a somewhat different fashion and is not as thorough. It also falls well short of what the LHP can do.

A viewer asks: “Is the healing process called “Ask and Receive” both effective and of value to learn?” How does it compare to Holographic Memory Resolution and DNA ThetaHealing, or the Lightworker Healing Protocol?

This process is of quite limited benefit and not worth pursuing. It is more wishful thinking and employment of the Law of Attraction which, as we have described, is a weak instrument and cannot approach the power and effectiveness of the tools you are contrasting in your question that truly probe the subconscious to get at the root of problems and resolve them.

A viewer asks: “Is the healing process called “Logosynthesis” both effective and of value to learn?” How does it compare to Holographic Memory Resolution and DNA ThetaHealing, or the Lightworker Healing Protocol?

This is similar to many approaches embraced over the years by psychologists believing that words alone can change the being, decisions made within the mind, and substituting descriptive analysis and presumably a deeper and richer understanding of gain and loss with one’s perspective will be sufficient to shift well-entrenched difficulties for the better. This is occasionally of benefit but is quite naive in its understanding which is only a surface one. There are many deep inner conflicts the mainstream psychology community knows nothing about nor will they be able to probe the true arena underlying most human suffering, nor do they have the tools capable of changing things for the better in an effective fashion, even if they had access to the level of the mind needing help. That is what the techniques you are comparing to can do quite readily, employed in the best way, so we would not recommend this approach in lieu of the others you mentioned.

You were optimistic about [name withheld]’s many symptoms improving after a Lightworker Healing Protocol session, but he tells me everything is the same. What happened?

This is simply a reinfestation with spirit meddlers. Because of his exquisite sensitivity to their energies and the many manipulations they can produce, it is hard for him to believe in a total freedom of such phenomena. Even though he does want this dearly on a conscious level, his inability to keep himself safe will, for a time at least, almost guarantee a reinfestation and when symptoms return quickly, he will lose confidence in the healing as well. The only way to succeed here is to get ahead of things by doing sessions repeatedly for him. This is being done already on automatic pilot, so to speak, but is not adequate to keep him clear because the level of human intent is somewhat less. So this is a true test of wills, in a sense, and can be augmented through your personal attention to do sessions for him at intervals. This can indeed be successful if you make that investment. It will still take some time but, in the end, you will win.

What can you share with the practitioner about what she experienced doing a Lightworker Healing Protocol session targeting herself as the client? Was it more effective in helping her than a session done for a group of others, but including herself?

This was not more effective than would otherwise be the case where she was in the background as one of a group being served with the healing. The uniqueness of her experience was simply her extra curiosity about what she might perceive and, as she was the primary target, all of the feedback pertained to her and her desire to perceive what was happening with the requests allowed her to experience things a bit more intensely because they are not diluted being divided among a group, some of which might have a particular phenomenon to a significant degree and others not, which would lessen the perception of need and the intensity of the healing carried out for a particular step. Despite the assumed clear wording of the Protocol, people will view their role in it and what to expect with somewhat different lenses and this can create some variety of the experiencing. This is perfectly fine because the main objective will still be served, to have the broad series of healing steps applied to all deemed as recipients—that is the most important goal and will always be honored. What the practitioner experiences is secondary to the healing work being carried out.

She is wondering, was it selfish being a practitioner to do a Lightworker Healing Protocol session targeting herself as the client?

It is never selfish to serve the self. It is a sacred duty to take care of your well-being as it nourishes the soul and will help your entire future materially. That, in turn, benefits not only you, but everyone you know or will come in contact with. The better you are as a person, the more complete, the more able to express and share love and accept this with delight from others, the more you serve your loved ones and the broader world by putting your energy forth. All activities will be enhanced by any healing done through the Protocol for oneself, so it is never inadvisable to target the self if that appears to be the highest priority or is simply desired out of concern.

We would say that using the Protocol as written in making the choice of primary target the self and leaving it at that, but still including the boilerplate requests to include all of the other groups the Protocol addresses is still important to do because there will be ample energy available. The primary client always gets first attention and that will not be hampered by including all the others as secondary targets, and to not do so would be a lost opportunity. Only in that case can you view a Protocol session as selfish if you do it knowing that you will not be underserved by including the other groups as well. To then exclude them, thinking that maybe you can eke out a little more special treatment would be in fact a diminishment of your intention because it would be then truly a selfish act in that regard and would incur a karmic penalty in addition. This is wholly unnecessary as you can be served while you are serving the broader community of souls in need and create a win-win by designating yourself as the primary target. This means all perceived feedback will focus on you and your particular needs and karmic history, so any desired information about things you wish to probe will be fully accessible and you can do as much or little of this as you wish.

You have indicated that subconscious channeling is the best way to see the episodes in parallel lifetimes and set them right. But if a client’s symptom is coming largely from cellular memory, encouraging the deep subconscious to go looking for explanations through channeling may only reinforce the body’s perceived need to produce it, so it will not fade, as will likely happen using the Lightworker Healing Protocol alone. How can people best determine when and when not, to use subconscious channeling with trauma resolution?

This can be nicely sidestepped as an issue by doing each session as Parts Work in your latest version of the Lightworker Healing Protocol, to ask Creator to call forth that subpart of the deep subconscious most relevant and involved with the client’s issue and then further request Creator to guide that part of the deep subconscious to those memories in the akashic record that would be most helpful to address in resolving the dilemma. By allowing divine discretion to guide the session in that way, simply adding the words “highest and best” to the guidance for what needs to be shown the deep subconscious will give the divine realm a perfect instruction to ensure whatever is focused on will still add something and not take away by stirring up the problem too unduly and reverse the healing of gains made previously. So this is a nuance that has benefits and is a testament to your careful and thorough approach here, striving to do the utmost to obtain high-quality results and the greatest possible benefit for all you work with.

Will using the Lightworker Healing Protocol help the McDowell triplets who were rendered autistic by their abreaction to vaccination at 9 months of age?

This is very much the case. They greatly need healing assistance and especially because this is karmic, it will not yield to any attempts at therapy other than some supportive coaching doing a minor assistance in helping to guide them to cope better with the dilemma, but they cannot do what is not in them. When connections are unavailable, the lines being down, so to speak, and they simply cannot carry out many basic functions in connecting the parts of the mind needed to carry out complicated thinking, because this is karmic especially, it comes under the aegis of the client’s free will. So not being the result of extraterrestrial manipulation, as is so often the case for many autistic infants, we cannot more aggressively reverse the injury, so karmic repair is very timely and appropriate.