In the Bible, In James 3:14 (NLT), he cautions those who wish to be wise, “… if you are bitterly jealous and there is selfish ambition in your heart, don’t cover up the truth with boasting or lying.” What is Creator’s perspective?

This is certainly good advice. It is warning the reader about the dangers of giving in to jealousy, and that selfish ambition born of envy, wanting to even up the perceived difference in favor of the self, and perhaps even surmount and outdo the perceived opposition in the contest. In actuality, that contest, in which the jealous individual does not feel they measure up, is a self-generated and self-created perception that will never be realistic and accurate. After all, the feeling of jealousy itself is based on a dark inner feeling of dislike, in seeing someone outdoing the person or outshining them, and beginning to resent the unequal status. This often creates a situation where people will engage in lying, or a distortion in some way, to minimize the perceived shortcoming that is bothersome. But in doing so, the person is, in a sense, walking out on a limb further and further because in lying they risk exposure, and not only will their attempt at compensation fall apart, they will be exposed with a very intense focus on what they self‑reveal is a contrast between the object of envy and themselves. The very last thing they would want to see happen as their strategy of lying is meant to cover up what is making them uncomfortable to, in effect, hide it from view.

So this is good advice meant to help protect people from themselves, to guide them towards a better course of action so as not to compound the damage from being out of alignment and giving in to jealous feelings. When one adds another emotional misalignment that is a kind of transgression in the bargain, it becomes a wider error and, in fact, a defect. While jealousy is simply a person’s perspective they are being outdone by someone else’s attributes, lying is an overt act putting them on record through their intentions to manipulate and deceive others. When the likelihood is, what their jealousy is making them worry about in terms of their own shortcomings, may not even be noticed by others and it is almost certainly the case others will not care if they even share similar standards in evaluating the issue of concern and its very nature. After all, most people do not go around judging others on superficial characteristics, often the cause of jealously, like attractiveness or having personal possessions that might be accoutrements of accomplishment and a kind of status symbol. So someone who goes out of their way to try to falsely build themselves up through a false narrative will, in fact, by lying, expose themselves to be the lesser person and greatly worsen their situation because then they will be dealing with two difficulties—the perceived shortcomings making them jealous, and having been called out by someone catching them in a lie.

We can request to be shown Creator’s Truth about a problem. Can that be applied to a need for healing? Can we request that Creator look from the standpoint of Creator’s ultimate truth about the cause of a person’s dilemma and identify any and all karmic issues that can be addressed through this process to rebalance and repair? Could this be a magic workaround for clients we know little about, and/or can’t describe their issues, or even for every client, as Creator will always know what is highest and best to work on?

Here you are bumping into an area of greater complexity than you might appreciate. That is not hard to do given the complexity of life itself and the many complex workings of energy, and the interplay of human versus divine intentions always underway that will parallel one another, harmonize, and sometimes clash, and are all subject to many complicated rules of engagement that may well be situation-dependent. But this is certainly a potent and meaningful way to go for the ultimate of benefits in employing divine wisdom as a guide to your healing session. So Creator can be used as a detective, so to speak, to help the deep subconscious identify and prioritize the very most meaningful events—past, present, or future life related—so those key things will be attended to and not missed.

The limitation, of course, is that the deep subconscious mind cannot do an entire lifetime but only a small subset of concerns and their underpinnings. That will still be a quite large bite of the apple, so to speak, compared to what the conscious human mind could comprehend even, let alone work on systematically, without getting hopelessly lost, overwhelmed, and left in a state of confusion. So, in calling this a “magic workaround,” it is not an inappropriate label, but not truly accurate in the sense it cannot simply be plugged in and make a miracle transformation happen because of its reach and depth and comprehensive nature. Keep in mind what is highest and best would be to work through the entire prior karmic history of an individual to truly clear their balance sheet once and for all. So this is still a somewhat open-ended and vague request, after all, because it is not possible to work on the total aggregate of discord. So this will work to best advantage with issues of finite scope, for example, a healing need where one has a set of symptoms, perhaps with a diagnosis, and that is a discrete need of the client that might well have a huge and complicated karmic predisposition but is still only one consequence out of many the client will deal with in the course of their lifetime. So what we are saying is it is still preferable to do a careful exploration with a client and establish a case history, much like a physician, to see what their life is like currently and what they can identify as their chief complaints, so to speak, to use as a starting point, but then applying your request for Creator’s input and guidance, to help the deep subconscious connect to the very most important underpinnings and address them, as the best of both worlds you can do in getting the best possible outcomes from your healing work.

A great deal of witchcraft and belief in witchcraft revolved around agriculture. One particularly interesting belief was the notion that witches could steal a cow’s milk with the use of a towel. The story goes that the witch would hang a towel on a rack, kneed and squeeze a corner of the towel as if it was a teat, and draw milk out of the towel and into a waiting bucket as if it was the cow itself. This was suspected when farmers would suddenly and unexpectedly have “dry cows.” Is there ANY truth to these stories? What is the real backstory?

The true origin of the stories associated with unproductive dairy cows is that livestock can, in fact, be targeted through psychic attacks via witchcraft to harm them, to induce illness, and reduce things like milk production and weight gain just as witchcraft can be used to harm a person physically, mentally, and emotionally. The stories that “dry cows” happened because a witch is magically transferring the milk from the cow, through something like a towel, and collecting it in a bucket were simply to add an explanation and seeming validity to the accusations, that witchcraft was behind the plight of farmers seeing milk production plummet, when the real reason was an energetic phenomenon disrupting the energetics of the animal’s makeup and resulting in abnormal physiologic functioning.

There are many adverse physical phenomena that can be produced in living things, using psychic energy, because everything has consciousness. So a malevolent individual, who uses their psychic ability like a weapon, can impinge on a target and cause an energetic disruption and disarray, and any number of things might happen as a consequence, even physical objects like electrical appliances and plumbing can be damaged through consciousness applied in the right way. There are many dark spirits who can bring such things about, and those dark spirits are often entrained, enticed to serve a dark purpose through psychic manipulation, by someone adept in witchcraft. That demonic spirit or lost soul human spirit trapped in an earthbound state that is of a low vibration, often a criminal, in effect, can be manipulated and given marching orders to cause harm with someone that practitioner wishes to target, and this will be carried out and can become a quite severe situation, and be quite confounding to the victim and authorities who might be brought in, assuming a physical criminal of some kind has intruded and damaged things. But, of course, a culprit will never be found because the culprit is truly invisible and being commanded by dark psychic intentions.

A close cousin of “white lies” are “lies of omission.” In navigating this world, one encounters people with “false impressions” based on judgments made quickly with incomplete information, or biases where contrary evidence is simply ignored. In these situations, allowing a person to continue believing and acting in a way that is contrary to the actual truth of a situation is often characterized as “lying by omission.” There can be countless motivations for doing this, from greed to sympathy to personal safety. Some would argue that lies of omission are just as dishonest as overt lies. What is Creator’s perspective?

The situation is very much a close parallel to the complications of using white lies because lies of omission, in effect, are a kind of manipulation to not own up to the reality of the situation, in some respect, in order to maintain the assumptions of others as a way of gaining something for the self, in being accepted more readily, when if one were more truthful it might bring up something to invite criticism or being seen in a prejudiced way. And so, in such a position one might feel pressure to mislead using a lie of omission to avoid being probed more thoroughly, and risk being called into question for misrepresenting oneself. But, of course, to continue maintaining that omission perpetuates the misrepresentation and adds to the potential consequences. After all, a lie of omission might simply be a temporary circumstance for any number of reasons, but made up for later with full disclosure, perhaps when in private or to make a special outreach to correct a possible misinterpretation. In other words, to come clean at the risk of even being rejected. That would certainly be taking the high ground in being scrupulous to not misrepresent oneself and take advantage of others, who might falsely assume too much of you, and to let that stand is a misrepresentation involving moral imperatives and karmic consequences.

So we agree with the characterization that, as a general rule, lies of omission are often just as dishonest as overt lies. They might seem more acceptable because they happen due to the false assumptions of others and not a deliberate falsehood being proffered, but to not speak up and correct a false assumption that puts you in a better light that is not deserved is comparable in every way to having told a lie to make yourself look good. Such situations are what the conscience is for and normally people will feel troubled if something happens and they are given credit where it is not really due and, rather than let it stand, will go and confess there was a misunderstanding and they want to set the record straight. That is a good demonstration of character and, in most cases, will be much appreciated as a witness to honest action when someone could easily perpetuate and benefit from flattering opinion of them as a kind of cheating. The fact there is not a referee present to call them out in falsely accepting undue recognition or praise does not mean they are following the rules—the Law of Karma is always watching and will have the final say.

Dr. Viktor Frankl wrote that in his opinion, it was possible to “lie with the truth.” He cited as an example a man who came to him plagued with guilt about an illicit affair he had some 20 years earlier. His wife never learned of it and was still ignorant of it when he sought Frankl’s advice. Dr. Frankl implored him NOT to tell her. His reason for doing so was because he believed that the man truly loved his wife and had no desire to traumatize her. Based on what he knew of the man’s wife, he was convinced that there was little to no chance of the wife receiving the news without drawing the false conclusion that he did not love her, and consequently would not be able to forgive him. So he attempted to coach the man, that telling her the truth, would be akin to lying, for it would encourage her to believe a lie—that her husband did not ever love her. The man ignored Frankl’s advice, and the result was an ugly divorce with both parties deeply emotionally traumatized. Was Frankl right? What is Creator’s perspective?

Here again is a good illustration that there is a time and a place for truth, and a time and a place to shield someone from unpleasantness that serves no useful purpose and, moreover, is likely to be quite destructive in such a situation, to adhere strictly to conveying truth that would end up doing greater harm. This is very much akin to the issue of people having a tremendous past history they are largely unaware of but can access the akashic records via their deep subconscious and dream about it. If they are told by a psychic medium, for example, they have done something horrendous in a past life without offering a way for them to heal the karmic consequences, it becomes a kind of hexing that can haunt them and cause grave damage in imparting fear that now they will be punished, that God might not love them, that they might be a worse person than even they believed, and so on.

The situation described is a perfect example of a beneficial lie, that is a lie of omission, but shields the wife from a severe overreaction that would cause harm to both parties when that could be avoided and genuine love still shared by the couple. That is a far better outcome than adhering to the seemingly high standard of holding to truth scrupulously, and to a fault, in this case. The admonition in our rule for living, to raise up others with no harm to the self, and raise up the self with no harm to others, is illustrated beautifully in this moral dilemma, seemingly. If you look simply at who benefits and why, and who is harmed and why, through sharing the true life history that would be damning for the husband, it is reduced to a kind of energetic equation that is perhaps more manageable to see in the light of how to proceed than an arbitrary black and white interpretation of right versus wrong, truth versus falsehood, can convey.

There are practical consequences from every life decision and choice of action, and it is the energetic consequence that is utmost in importance. To be sure, an energetic consequence can play out as guilt when truth is avoided inappropriately and the conscience takes a toll on a person, but that is simply an extension of what we are suggesting here as a way of dealing with such dilemmas, to analyze their merits, pro and con, with the choices being considered, and to honor both parties and the relative degree of negativity either way—that will be a useful guide in most instances. There are many examples where people can see truth to a much greater degree and because most humans are flawed, and many deeply so, one who sees this even though representing, in that respect, a higher authority, with respect to knowledge and discernment, to go around criticizing people for their flaws might be an exercise in truth-telling but fails dismally in terms of morality because, in the energetic equation of what is lost and what is gained, it becomes very clear that someone told about their flaws, over which they may have little ability to change, can be deeply hurtful rather than helpful, and to be the one in a position to point out their shortcomings only gains a reward to their ego because seeing someone else as being lesser is not a feat of greatness.

A viewer asks: “Is this “Ministry of Truth,” the Disinformation Governance Board, an Extraterrestrial manipulation to keep all people from questioning the mainstream narrative?”

This, indeed, is an extraterrestrial idea manipulated to happen through mind control of government officials to make them believe this is a worthwhile undertaking that will contribute to the management of public opinion as a way of deflecting criticism. Keep in mind that people in government are manipulated to believe many false ideas and precepts, even without supporting evidence or information that is actually substantive. Because they are subjected to mind control, that will not matter, because they will believe what they are made to believe regardless of reality, but it is certainly helpful to them, having to defend so many corrupt policies, if they have more ways to deflect criticism and to silence those critics. And that is the purpose here, to increase the power of the state to suppress and subjugate the citizenry, even though those government officials themselves see this as only helpful, and a positive contribution that will increase the accuracy of official communications, when the opposite is the case.

A viewer asks: “A channeler previously described by Creator as false channeling, is currently advising their followers that those that took the vaccine have lost their ability to make free will decisions and will be “called home.” No amount of prayer or anything can now reverse this—they allege. Although channeling a false source, this is pretty serious stuff, and is there any truth to it, is it fear-mongering or are there any circumstances where it is possible to find oneself without free will in a free will zone?”

What is serious here is that people are willing to listen to false channelers and take to heart what they might say. We understand something that is disquieting, and even alarming, as this information represents, will be quite unpleasant and unsettling, and cause inner doubts because one is left to wonder, “What if it really is true this time?” That is the purpose of the false information being promoted here through this channeler, who is corrupt, in receiving information from the Extraterrestrial Alliance and not the lofty being she believes she is channeling. Your experience in listening to this channeler and being upset and disturbed by some of the information coming forth is a perfect illustration of why channelers are dangerous when misguided. Because many things they say will ring true, it will be very difficult for people to know what is accurate and what is not. Moreover, people listening will get additional programming they are unaware of from the communications, so there is a double penalty in listening to such sources.

An Unknown Person offered this definition of stupid: “Knowing the truth, seeing the truth, but still believing in lies.” What is Creator’s perspective?

While this contains many potential and actual truths, depending on the application, it is used as an explanation for something taking place. Here as well, there is deeper truth to be unearthed. The description would seem to be simply someone limited by their stupidity, to not be capable of accepting new information, almost like their brain is full and what was first learned can never be displaced because there is not even room to turn around and make a change. But this description is more than simple intellectual ability under review, it is not about level of knowledge and understanding, but the level of rigidity in being unable to change one’s beliefs even in the face of proof their interpretation is faulty. While native intelligence is always a factor, especially if a situation or issue is complex and nuanced in ways requiring a fair degree of sophistication, and perhaps life experience, to really understand what is involved and see shades of meaning, and so forth, the more serious a concern here is the inability to shift faulty thinking and a belief in lies when they are exposed as such and the proof is in hand and visible.

Many, many times people will continue to believe the lies they have held and will ignore evidence to the contrary, no matter how many times they are told new information that runs counter to their beliefs. This is a frank malfunction and illogical working of the mind to disregard what runs counter to the knowledge base, even when the words and meaning of the contrary opinion are understandable. So the problem here is not necessarily stupidity, it is intransigence, the frank inability to change a belief. People do this on a regular basis all during growth and maturation, and even though people tend to become set in their ways, that, too, is largely a function of outside manipulation to make them more and more rigid and unable to change their thinking because they have been cultivated to be suppressed and subjugated, and “good little prisoners” who will not think outside the box, or even stray beyond their prison walls, even though the latter might be abstract and not an actual physical fortification constraining them.

Mind control programming creates this very state of being, where people believe what they are told by authorities, not because the authorities themselves have presented a logical and convincing case, but because the talking heads are reinforced by subliminal programming going directly into the subconscious minds of the viewers to program their beliefs, that what the talking heads say is true. When an idea is programmed to be accepted, it needs no corroboration or validation, it simply becomes the way the person thinks and they will be unable to override this built-in belief, no matter what they see or hear to the contrary—that is the hallmark of mind control manipulation. If you watch carefully what goes on around you, especially in the media, you will see examples every day of “groupthink” that is truly mind control manipulation being applied to warring factions, who will never come together and find a happy medium because their beliefs cannot meet in the middle, and this is a travesty but an important reason why humanity cannot overcome the chronic problems of society, where things that are mistaken happen again and again, and people and nations perpetuate the same follies over and over throughout history, never seeming to learn the lessons and recognize they are falling into the same trap over and over.

There has been much discussion about the origin of the Reptilians being Draconians from the Alpha Draconis star system of the Draco constellation. Is this truly where they are from or a subterfuge? Are they actually from the Lyra constellation which we’ve been advised is a hidden truth?

You are correct on both of your assessments. The association with the Draco systems is entirely a misguided notion, and that is only because of the naming of that constellation being in alignment with their Reptilian nature, that this was seized upon by many early mediums encountering these beings and wishing to understand them. It was a confusion of the information and a false conclusion that resulted. These beings are indeed from Lyra and they wish to keep this a secret. There are many reasons for this, including the wish to not have any human light beings targeting their system with energy of any kind. They do not wish to have their warriors undermined by a mixed message that might begin to soften their rough edges. They take great pride in their military ways and desire to dominate and control others and anything less they see as unforgivable weakness.

Will the pedogate and pizzagate stories be important for opening up the truth about the secret government cabal?

They will be important and you have seen the handwriting on the wall about this from your interview with Bob Hope, and now looking at the book by Brice Taylor about her being drawn into this vortex. This extends much more widely than anyone still is aware, and will be a very clear demonstration of corruption on a massive scale that begins to look quite abnormal and quite inexplicable, even considering human foibles and the frequency with which people indulge themselves in sexual excesses, and break the rules of society, and their marital vows, and so on.

But keep in mind those, too, are from inner corruption, so it can be on a highly individual level and only affect that individual and perhaps one other person, or it can affect many, many, people and have ripples far and wide in a widening circle of pressures and counter pressures and many karmic layers, when the actions lead to situations where people are compromised, and then this is used as pressure to induce them to do additional wrongdoing or to cover up information, and that leading to other malfeasance. This is the case with the widespread wholesale corruption via sexuality that is part of many organizations and will help people understand the extent to which humans have been forced off track through outside manipulation.